Anandaraj v. The State Rep By, The Inspector Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 11-11-2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR CRL OP NO.30786 of 2025 Anandaraj ... Petitioner/ Accused Vs The State rep. by, The Inspector of Police, Thirumuruganpoondi Police Station, Tiruppur.

(Crime No.421 of 2025) ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petitions filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to grant bail to the petitioner/accused in Crime No.421 of 2025 registered on the file of the respondent.

For Petitioner(s) :

Mr. J. Franklin For Respondent(s) :

Mr. A. Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl. Side) ******* 1/4

ORDER

The petitioner herein, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 10.09.2025 for the offences punishable under Section 103(1) of BNS in Crime No.421 of 2025, registered on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2.

The allegation against the petitioner herein is that, the petitioner and the deceased are neighbours; that the deceased was living alone in her house and on the alleged day of occurrence, the petitioner approached the deceased and demanded money; that while the same was refused by the deceased, the petitioner got enraged and murdered the deceased by slitting her throat. Hence, this case. 3.

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case purely on suspicion and he is in judicial custody since 10.09.2025; that there is no eye witness to the occurrence; and that the petitioner is ready to abide by any condition that may be imposed by this Court and sought for bail to the petitioner. 2/4

4.

The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent while opposing the bail to the petitioner reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that there are witnesses and evidence to connect the petitioner in this case; and that the investigation of the case is pending.

5.

Considering the submissions made on both sides, grave nature of offence, taking note of the fact that the investigation of this case is pending and if the petitioner is enlarged on bail, there is possibility of hampering the investigation process, hence this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

6.

Accordingly, this criminal original petition stands dismissed. 11.11.2025 stn K. RAJASEKAR, J.

3/4

stn To

1. The Inspector of Police, Thirumuruganpoondi Police Station, Tiruppur.

(Crime No.421 of 2025)

2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

CRL OP NO.30786 of 2025 11.11.2025 4/4