Tata Capital Ltd v. Jeevan Raghavan

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 15.12.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH Tata Capital Limited, By its Associate Legal Remedial, R.Kamalakkannan Having its office at 1st Floor, Centennial Square, 6A-Dr.Ambedkar Salai, Kodambakkam, Chennai - 600 024.

.... Applicant Vs.

Jeevan Raghavan .... Respondent Arbitration Application under Order XIV Rule 8 of Original Side Rules r/w Section 9 (ii) (b) (d) & (e) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, praying to appoint K.Kamalakkannan, employed as employee currently designated as Associate Legal remedial in the Applicant Company having his office First Floor, Centennial Square, Dr.Ambedkar Salai, Kodambakkam, Chennai, Tamil Nadu - 600 024 as Receiver to seize and deliver the asset SELTOS bearing Engine No.G4FLLV092614 Chassis No.MZBEU812TLN179286, Registration No.TN12AL2772 situated at Plot No.102, 1st Floor, Astar Homes, 10th Street, Prakash Nagar, Tiruninravur, Chennai - 602 024, Tamil Nadu or wherever it is found more fully described here under, with police aid or break open the premises from wherever it is found and hand over the same to the applicant.

1/4

For Applicant : Mr.N.K.Vanan *****

ORDER

This application has been filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [for brevity 'the Act'] for appointment of a receiver to seize and deliver the vehicle to the applicant, if required, with police aid.

2. The petitioner extended financial facilities to the respondent. Since the respondent committed default, a recall notice dated 08.06.2023 was issued and in spite of receipt of the same, there was no response from respondent. It is under these circumstances, the present petition came to be filed before this Court.

3. When the application came up for hearing on 17.11.2025, this Court issued notice to respondent.

4. Private notice has been served on the respondent and affidavit of service has also been filed. The name of the respondent has also been printed in the cause list. However, the respondent is neither present nor represented through counsel. Hence, the apprehension raised 2/4

on the side of the applicant that the respondent is trying to secret the vehicle is prima facie established.

5. In view of the above, Mr.K.Kamalakkannan, Associate Legal, is appointed as the Court receiver and the Court receiver is permitted to seize the vehicle from the respondents or wherever it is found and by breaking open the premises, if required with police assistance.

This application stands disposed of in the above terms. 15.12.2025 gm N.ANAND VENKATESH, J.

gm 3/4

15.12.2025 4/4