R Prabhakaran v. The State Rep. By The Inspector Of Police
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 14.11.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Crl.O.P.No.
31112 R.Prabhakaran ... Petitioner Vs.
The State rep by , The Inspector of Police, Thelar Police Station, Thiruvannamalai District. .. Respondent (Cr.No.207 of 2025) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of her arrest by the respondent police in Crime No.207 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police.
For Petitioner : Mr.J.Rajkumar For Respondent : Mr.S.Udayakumar Government Advocate (Crl. Side) 1/6
ORDER
The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 296(b), 115(2) of BNS in Cr.No.207 of 2025, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that A1 was alleged to have borrowed a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- from the defacto complainant and stated that he would be returned the same within two weeks. Subsequently quarrel arose between them. A2 abused and attacked the defacto complainant with wooden log and caused injuries to the defacto complainant. Hence, the present complaint has been lodged.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has not committed any such offense as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the 2/6
injured has been discharged from the hospital. Hence, prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and reported that the the injured has been discharged from the hospital and there is no previous case against him. However, he strongly opposed the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.
6. Considering the nature of offence and the injured has been discharged from the hospital and no previous cases reported, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to certain conditions 3/6
7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date on which the order copy made, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Vandavasi on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction learned Magistrate concerned, and on further condition that:
(a) If the petitioner fails to surrender before the concerned Magistrate within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, this order shall stand automatically cancelled;
(b) The sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the application for surety ship (Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019]'. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of identify proofs to ensure their identity; 4/6
(c) The petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of three weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation;
(d) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate actions against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on anticipatory bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji v. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; (e)If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS Act.
14.11.2025 Vv 5/6
To
1. The Judicial Magistrate, Vandavasi
2. The Inspector of Police, Thelar Police Station, Thiruvannamalai District.
3.The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras, Chennai 600 104.
6/6
K.RAJASEKAR , J.
Vv Crl.O.P.No.31112 of 2025 7/6
14.11.2025 8/6