N.Sundaresan v. The Inspector Of Police,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 14.11.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR CRL.O.P.No.31141 of 2025

1. N.Sundaresan

2. Padmavathy

3. Nagarajan Petitioners Vs The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Chennai.

Cr.No.Not known of 2025.

....Respondent For Petitioner : Mr.N.Umapathy For Respondent : Mr.S.Udayakumar Government Advocate (Crl.side

ORDER

The petitioners who were apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 85, 351(2) of BNS in Crime No. Not known of 2025, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. Today, when the matter taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent Police submitted that petition enquiry is pending.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondent. 1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

K.RAJASEKAR, J.

kmm

4. Considering the facts and circumstances, the respondent police has to issue notice under Section 41(A) of Cr.P.C to the petitioner and the petitioners are directed to appear before the respondent police and the Investigating Officer has to conduct the enquiry by strictly following the procedures therein and if any prima facie case is made out against the petitioners, register the F.I.R or close the petition enquiry within a period of three (3) weeks from today. The parties are directed to cooperate with the enquiry. It is needless to say that the respondent police shall not take any coercive steps to secure the accused till the completion of enquiry on the complaint lodged by the defacto complainant.

5. With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

14.11.2025 kmm To

1. The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Chennai.

2. The Public Prosecutor Madras High Court.

Crl.O.P.No.31141 of 2025 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis