K. Dillikumar v. State Rep By Inspector Of Police,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 18.11.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Crl.O.P.No.31039 of 2025 K.Dillikumar ... Petitioner Vs.
State rep. by Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Kanchipuram.
... Respondent (Cr.No.58 of 2025) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Cr.No.58 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Naveen Chandar For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
O R D E R
The petitioner, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Sections 69 and 89 of BNS in Crime No.58 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 1/6
2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner, on the pretext of marriage, entered into a sexual relationship with the victim girl and thereafter refused to marry her. Hence the present case.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this Court.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) would submit that the FIR was registered recently and the investigation has not yet been completed. He would further submit that apart from this case, there is no previous case pending against the petitioner. Hence, he opposed the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, and also taking note of the age of the defacto complainant, and the fact that both were in relationship for some period, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions:
7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the 2/6
event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Kancheepuram, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, and on further condition that: [a] if the petitioner fails to surrender before the concerned Magistrate within a period of ten days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, this order shall stand automatically cancelled;
[b] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity;
[c] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of three weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation;
3/6
K.RAJASEKAR , J.
kmm [d] On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the aforementioned conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283];
[e] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S. [f] The petitioner shall co-operate for the medical examination, if any, required by the Investigating Officer.
18.11.2025 kmm To
1. The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Kancheepuram.
2. Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Kanchipuram.
3.The Public Prosecutor, 4/6
High Court of Madras.
Crl.O.P.No.31039 of 2025 5/6