Saithalavi P. H v. State Rep. By The Inspector Of Police,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 14.11.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Crl.O.P.No.31133 of 2025 Saithalavi ... Petitioner Vs.

State rep by , The Inspector of Police, Veeraganur Police Station, Salem District.

... Respondent (Cr.No.194 of 2025) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in the Crime No.194 of 2025 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police.

For Petitioner : Mr.E.Kannadasan For Respondent : Mr.S.Udaya Kumar Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

ORDER

The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 191(2), 296(b), 115(2), 118(1) and 351(3) of BNS, 2023 in 1/5

Cr.No.194 of 2025, on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to business dispute between the petitioner and the defacto complainant regarding exporting of coriander leaves, the petitioner abused and attacked the defacto complainant with iron rods and stones and also caused injuries to the petitioner.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He is ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police, reiterated the prosecution case and reported that the injured has been discharged from the hospital. Hence, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

6. Considering the nature of offence and the fact that the injured has been discharged from the hospital, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to certain conditions 2/5

7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date on which the order copy made, before the learned Judicial Magistrate Court-I, Attur on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction learned Magistrate concerned, and on further condition that:

(a) If the petitioner fails to surrender before the concerned Magistrate within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, this order shall stand automatically cancelled;

(b) The sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the application for surety ship (Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019]'. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of identify proofs to ensure their identity; (c) The petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of three weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation;

3/5

(d) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate actions against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on anticipatory bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji v. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; (e)If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS Act.

14.11.2025 Vv To

1. The Judicial Magistrate Court-I, Attur.

2. The Inspector of Police, Veeraganur Police Station, Salem District.

3.The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras, Chennai 600 104.

4/5

K.RAJASEKAR , J.

Vv Crl.O.P.No.31133 of 2025 14.11.2025 5/5