C.V.Venkatramanappa @ Periya Venkataramanappa v. The District Collector
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 10-12-2025
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE C.V.Venkatramanappa @ Periya Venkataramanappa, S/o. Late Venkatapathiyappan, No.3/520, Gollapettai Street, Bagalur Village And Post, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District-635 103 ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1.The District Collector, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri-635 115 2.The Additional Chief Secretary, The Commissioner Of Land Administration, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005 3.The Sub-collector, Denkanikotta Road, Hosur635109 4.The District Revenue Officer, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri-635115 5.Revenue Divisional Officer, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri-635002.
6.The Thasildar, Hosur 635109 7.K.C. JayaprakashNo.42, Chowdeswari Nilaya, Kada Agrahara Village, Sajapura Hobli, Anekal Taluk, Bangalore -562125 ..Respondent(s) directing the 5th Respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 15.09.2025 and cancel the patta bearing Nos.1178, 1779, __________Page 1 of 5
and 2201 in view of the circular issued by the 2nd Respondent bearing Ref. No.K3/27160/2008 dated 13.03.2018 For Petitioner(s):
Mr.G.J.Baskar Narayan For Respondent(s):
Mr.C.Jayaprakash, GA (R1 to R6)
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the fifth respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 15.09.2025 seeking for cancellation of patta bearing Nos.1178, 1779 and 2201 standing in the name of the 7 th respondent, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.
2. The petitioner claims that since the suit is pending with regard to title of the property morefully described in the affidavit filed in support of this writ petition, patta ought not to have been issued to the 7 th respondent as per Circular issued by the second respondent dated 13.03.2018. In view of the same, the petitioner had given a representation dated 15.09.2025 seeking to cancel the patta granted in favour of the 7 th respondent. Since the said representation is yet to be considered, the petitioner has filed this writ petition. __________Page 2 of 5
3. Mr.C.Jayaprakash, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 6. Since no adverse orders are passed against the th respondent, notice to the 7 th respondent in this writ petition is dispensed with.
4. No prejudice will be caused to the fifth respondent, if the petitioner's representation dated 15.09.2025 seeking for cancellation of patta granted in favour of the 7 th respondent is considered on merits and in accordance with law. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the fifth respondent to pass final orders, on merits and in accordance with law, on the petitioner's representation dated 15.09.2025 seeking for cancellation of patta granted in favour of the 7 th respondent, after giving due consideration to the circular dated 13.03.2018 issued by the second respondent, and after hearing the objections from the neighbour land owners and any other party as the fifth respondent deems fit to enquire. The fifth respondent is directed to complete the aforesaid exercise within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. This Court is not expression any opinion on the merits of the aforesaid __________Page 3 of 5
representation of the petitioner. No Costs.
10-12-2025 RKM To 1.The District Collector, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri-635 115 2.The Additional Chief Secretary, The Commissioner Of Land Administration, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005 3.The Sub-collector, Denkanikotta Road, Hosur635109 4.The District Revenue Officer, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri-635115 5.Revenue Divisional Officer, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri-635002 6.The Thasildar, Hosur 635109 __________Page 4 of 5
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.
RKM 10-12-2025 __________Page 5 of 5