The Managing Director v. Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation

W.M.P.Nos.51494, 51479, 51468, 51482, 51466, 51476, 48606, 48608 of 2025 in WP No. 24799 of 2017 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J., The impleading petitions are resisted on behalf of the respondents in the Writ Petition.

2.The learned Additional Solicitor General of India would submit that the Corporations are not at all necessary parties. Irrespective of the decision in the Writ Petition they are not going to be in any way either benefited or put to loss. Therefore, the impleading petitions are resisted. It is also further submitted that there are certain averments that are made in the affidavit which are factually incorrect and has to be refuted.

3.I have heard the said objections made on behalf of the learned Additional Solicitor General of India.

4.The allowing of the implead applications does not mean that the Court accepts whatever the allegation that is made in the affidavit filed in support of the impleading applications. Though as rightly contended by the learned counsel for the respondents, the Transport Corporation may not be necessary Page No.1 of 2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

parties, but they are proper parties in the sense that they want to place on record certain facts. In view thereof, the implead applications stand allowed. 5.It is stated otherwise the parties are ready to argue the matter, post the Writ Petition for final hearing, on 22.01.2026. 08.01.2026 ep W.M.P.Nos.51494, 51479, 51468, 51482, 51466, 51476, 48606, 48608 of 2025 in WP No. 24799 of 2017 Page No.2 of 2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis