A.Kumaravel v. The State Of Tamilnadu
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 27.11.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN W.P.No.45324 of 2025 and WMP.Nos.50476 & 50478 of 2025 A.Kumaravel ... Petitioner Vs.
1.THE STATE OF TAMILNADU, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, FORT ST. GEORGE, CHENNAI-600 009 2.THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION, O/O. THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION, COLLEGE ROAD, CHENNAI-600 006 3.THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER (ELEMENTARY), O/O THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICE, THARAMANGALAM, SALEM DISTRICT.
4.THE ASSISTANT ELEMENTARY EDUCATIONAL OFFICER. O/O. THE ASSISTANT ELEMENTARY EDUCATIONAL OFFICE, SANGAGIRI, SALEM DISTRICT.
5.THE BLOCK EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, O/O. THE BLOCK EDUCATIONAL OFFICE, SANGAGIRI, SALEM DISTRICT -637 301 ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus Calling for the records of the 2nd Respondent proceedings having Ref. No.Na.Ka. No.028490/E1/2024 dated 17.06.2025 raising objection to the grant of 1/6
incentive increment to the petitioner for the period from 19.11.2012 for obtaining the B.A. (Economics), B.Ed. and M.A. (Economics) Degree and of the 5th Respondent proceedings having Ref. No.Na.Ka. No.636/A1/A3/2025 dated 19.06.2025 ordering recovery of the incentive increment granted to the petitioner from 19.11.2012 to 31.05.2025 and refixation of the pay scale of the petitioner and quash the same as arbitrary and consequently direct the Respondents to continue to pay the incentive increment to the Petitioner for obtaining B.A. (Economics), B.Ed. and M.A. (Economics) degree For Petitioner : M/s.K.Chandra For Respondents : Mrs.S.Mythreye Chandru, Special Government Pleader
O R D E R
This writ petition has been filed challenging the proceedings of the 2nd Respondent having Ref. No.Na.Ka. No.028490/E1/2024 dated 17.06.2025 raising objection to the grant of incentive increment to the petitioner for the period from 19.11.2012 for obtaining the B.A. (Economics), B.Ed. and M.A. (Economics) Degree and of the 5th Respondent proceedings having Ref. No.Na.Ka. No.636/A1/A3/2025 dated 19.06.2025 ordering recovery of the incentive increment granted to the petitioner from 19.11.2012 to 31.05.2025 and refixation of the pay scale of the petitioner and consequently to direct the Respondents to 2/6
continue to pay the incentive increment to the Petitioner for obtaining B.A. (Economics), B.Ed. and M.A. (Economics) degree. 2.
The issue involved in this writ petition has already been dealt with by this Court in WP.No.24236 of 2025 and this Court by order dated 23.10.2025 quashed the orders impugned in that writ petition. The relevant portion of that order is extracted hereunder:
15. Further, the issue with regard to denial of 2 nd increment for M.Phil., degree dealt with by this Court in W.P.(MD).No.3697 of 2018 and this Court by order dated 25.01.2022 held that the conditions imposed in G.O.Ms.No.624 dated 13.07.1992 stand effaced. The earliest Government Order issued in this connection, is in the spirit of encouragement and to stimulate the appetite of teachers for study and exploration of different subjects. Any curtailment in this regard would be anathema and the removal of the conditions is, in my view, a proper and appropriate move. Therefore, the petitioners are entitled for their incentive increment which were already granted to them as per G.O.Ms.No.324, dated 25.04.1995.
16. Though the impugned orders were passed by referring to the order passed by the Madurai Bench of this 3/6
Court in W.P.(MD).No.22704 of 2018 dated 21.01.2025, it failed to consider the order passed by the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in W.A.No.2747 of 2023 dated 28.03.2025 in which this Court had categorically held that as per G.O.(Ms) No.324 dated 25.04.1995, all higher qualifications obtained in subjects which form part of the higher secondary syllabus shall be entitled to grant of incentive increments.
17. In view of the above, the orders impugned in these writ petitions cannot be sustained in toto and they have to be quashed and all impugned orders are hereby quashed in all the writ petitions 3.
Therefore, the same order can be passed in this writ petition as well. Accordingly, the impugned orders are quashed and this writ petition stands allowed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 27.11.2025 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order lok 4/6
To 1.THE STATE OF TAMILNADU, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, FORT ST. GEORGE, CHENNAI-600 009 2.THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION, O/O. THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION, COLLEGE ROAD, CHENNAI-600 006 3.THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER (ELEMENTARY), O/O THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICE, THARAMANGALAM, SALEM DISTRICT.
4.THE ASSISTANT ELEMENTARY EDUCATIONAL OFFICER. O/O. THE ASSISTANT ELEMENTARY EDUCATIONAL OFFICE, SANGAGIRI, SALEM DISTRICT.
5.THE BLOCK EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, O/O. THE BLOCK EDUCATIONAL OFFICE, SANGAGIRI, SALEM DISTRICT -637 301 5/6
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.
lok 27.11.2025 6/6