Madras High CourtCRL MP/24475/2025dismissed

K.G.Shanmugaraj v. K.Shyam Prashad,

2026-01-02Honourable Mr Justice A.D.Jagadish Chandira4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 02-01-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA AND CRL OP NO. 24384 OF 2025 K.G.Shanmugaraj S/o.K.Gurunathan ..Petitioner(s) Vs

1. K.Shyam Prashad, S/o.Kannaparamathama

2. State of Tamilnadu rep.by, The Sub Inspector of Police, J-5, Sastri Nagar Police Station, Chennai. Cr.No.88 of 2025.

3. Manivannan, Manager, Mint Hospital, Adyar, Chennai.

..Respondent(s) CRL OP No. 24384 of 2025 K.Shyam Prashad, S/o. Kannaparamathma ..Petitioner(s) Vs

1. The State Rep by its, The Inspector of Police (Law and Order) J-5, Sastri Nagar Police Station, Chennai - 600090.

2. R.Manivannan, Manager, Mint Hospital, Adyar, Chennai - 600020.

..Respondent(s) __________Page 1 of 4

PRAYER IN CRL MP No. 24475 of 2025 Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Sec.528 of B.N.S.S., 2023, to implead the petitioner/proposed respondent as one of the respondent in the present quash petition in Crl.OP.No.24384 of 2025 pending on the file of this Court.

PRAYER IN CRL OP No. 24384 of 2025 Criminal Original Petition filed under Sec.528 of B.N.S.S., 2023, to call for the records in connection with the FIR in Crime No. 88/2025 on the file of the first Respondent and quash the same in so far as the petitioner concerned. For Petitioner(s):

Mr.P.Venkatraman For Respondent(s):

Mr.S.Manuraj for Mr.A.M.Shek Mohammed Rafiq for R1 Mr.S.Santhosh, Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for R2 Mr.M.Ragul Kousik (VC) for R3

ORDER

This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is filed seeking to implead the petitioner/proposed 3rd respondent as the third respondent in the quash petition in Crl.OP.No.24384 of 2025 pending on the file of this Court.

2. Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for petitioner submitted that the petitioner is the husband of one Keerthigaa Kabilar, who is alleged to have been treated by the accused, who is the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No. 24384 of 2025. He further submitted that based on the fabricated documents, All Women Police Station, T.Nagar had registered a case against the petitioner.

__________Page 2 of 4

3. Taking into consideration the aforesaid fact, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner may not be a necessary party in the present proceedings. However, in the event of the petitioner/proposed party required for enquiry, the 2nd respondent police may enquire him.

4. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition stands dismissed with the above observation.

02-01-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order RPP To

1. The Sub Inspector of Police, J-5, Sastri Nagar Police Station, Chennai.

2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. __________Page 3 of 4

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA J.

RPP AND CRL OP NO. 24384 OF 2025 02-01-2026 __________Page 4 of 4