← Library
Madras High CourtArb Appln/1611/2025disposed of

Tata Capital Ltd v. Anbu Mani

2026-01-27Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh2 pages

Arb Appln No. 1611 of 2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 27-01-2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH Arb Appln No. 1611 of 2025 Tata Capital Ltd By its Associate Legal Remedial R.Kamalakannan Having its office at 1st Floor, Centennial Square 6A Dr.Ambedkar Salai, Kodambakkam Chennai 600 024 Applicant(s) Vs Anbumani Respondent(s) PRAYER To pass an order Appointing Abish DJ , employed as employee currently designated as Legal Manager in the Applicant company having his office at First Floor, Centennil Square Dr.Ambedkar Salai, Kodambakkam, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600 024 as Receiver to seize and deliver the asset MAHINDRA BOLERO B6 (O) BS VI bearing Engine No.TVN6K84686 Chassis No.MA1XK2TVXN6L41967 Reg.No.TN37EX0077 situated No.6 437, 28th Street, MGR Nagar, Koilambakkam, Kancheepuram, Land Mark Near Karumari Amman Temple, Chennai 60 117, Tamil nadu..or wherever it is found morefully described hereunder, with police aid or break open the premises from wherever found and handover the same to the applicant For Applicant(s):

Mr.N.K.Vanan

ORDER

This application has been filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, for appointment of a Receiver to seize the subject vehicle in the custody of the respondent or wherever found, if necessary, with police protection and by breaking open the premises and deliver the same to the applicant.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Arb Appln No. 1611 of 2025 N. ANAND VENKATESH, J.

gya 2.When the application came up for hearing on 28.11.2025, this Court, on carefully going through the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of the application, thought it fit to order notice to the respondent to ascertain as to whether the respondent will be willing to settle the dispute. 3.When the matter was taken up for hearing today, affidavit of service has been filed and it is seen that the private notice sent to the respondent has been returned with an endorsement "insufficient address". It is clear from the above that the respondent is evading service, since the notice that was sent to the address found in the agreement, has been returned. The whereabouts of the vehicle is also not known. Hence, the apprehension of the applicant that the respondent is attempting to secret the vehicle is prima facie established. 4.

In view of the above, Mr. Abish DJ, Legal Manager, is appointed as Receiver for seizing the subject vehicle from the respondent or wherever it is found and by breaking open the premises, if required, with police aid. This application is disposed of in the above terms. 27-01-2026 gya Arb Appln No. 1611 of 2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.