← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/32952/2025dismissed

Vijayakumar@Gate Viji v. State Rep By The Inspector Of Police

2025-12-02Honourable Mr.Justice K.Rajasekar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 02.12.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR CRL OP NO. 32952 of 2025 Vijayakumar @ Gate Viji Petitioner Vs The State rep. by The Inspector of Police H-8, Thiruvottiyur Police Station Crime No. 1175 of 2025.

Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest pending investigation in Cr.No. 1175 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police.

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Mahendran For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Criminal Side) ----

O R D E R

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 08.11.2025, for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 296(b), 115(2), 311, 351(3), of BNS, 2023 in Crime No. 1175 of 2025 registered on the file respondent police, seeks bail.

1/6

2. The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner joined hands with other accused waylaid the de-facto complainant, threatened him and robbed a sum of Rs.200/- at knife point. Hence, the complaint was registered and the petitioner was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 08.11.2025.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in judicial custody from 08.11.2025. He further submits that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court and ready to furnish sufficient solvent sureties for his release. Hence, he prays for grant of bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) for the respondent police, reiterated the prosecution case and submits that though the petitioner was arrested and remanded to judicial custody since 08.11.2055, the property was recovered and this petitioner is having 8 bad antecedents viz., five cases u/s.307 of IPC and three robbery cases similar in nature. However, he vehemently opposed for grant of bail to the petitioner. 2/6

5. Considering the fact that the petitioner is having 8 bad antecedents and if the bail is granted to the petitioner he would indulge in similar activities in future, hence, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

6.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 02.12.2025 MSM To 1.The Inspector of Police H-8, Thiruvottiyur Police Station Crime No. 1175 of 2025.

2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

3/6

K.RAJASEKAR , J.

MSM Crl.O.P.No. 32952 of 2025 02.12.2025.

4/6