← Library
Madras High CourtCONT P/584/2026dismissed

V.K.Chellam, Ina v. Poochimurugan And 2 Others

2026-02-23Honourable Mr.Justice D.Bharatha Chakravarthy4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 23-02-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY V.K.Chellam, INA Vice President, All India Freedom Fighters Organisation, (TN Star Unite) Old No.841, New No.1148, 25th Street, BV Colony, Vyasarpadi, Chennai - 39.

..Petitioner Vs

1. Mr.Poochimurugan, The Chairman, The TN Housing Board, EC Market Salai, Koyembedu, Chennai-107.

2. Mr.T.Anthonysamy, The Additional Secretary The Govt. of Tamil Nadu, Public (Political Pension) Department, Secretariat, St.George Fort, Chennai - 600 009.

3. Mr.Prashant M Wadnere, Special Secretary to Government (Expenditure), Finance Department, Fort St.George, Secretariat, Chennai-9.

..Contemnors Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 praying to punish the respondents for their willful and intentional failure to comply with the order of this Court dated 23.04.2025 made in W.P.No.14392 of 2025.

For Petitioners:

Mr.V.Nandagopalan For Contemnors:

Mr.D.Veera Sekaran, Standing Counsel for R1 Mr.S.Senthil Murugan Special Government Pleader for R2 & R3

ORDER

The contempt petition is filed to punish the respondents for their wilful and intentional failure to comply with the order of this Court dated 23.04.2025 made in W.P.No.14392 of 2025.

2. Upon perusal of the order made in the writ petition, it can be seen that this Court has held that it is only the Government which has the power to exercise discretion under the quota, if available and therefore enabled the petitioner to make a representation and further directed that as and when any representation is made, the same shall be considered in accordance with law. Therefore, the petitioner ought to have made the representation and the same was not done. It was only a legal notice dated 25.08.2025 that was issued, which was answered by the Secretary to Government, Public (Political Pension-2) Department, Chennai- 9. Therefore, the present contempt petition cannot be entertained.

3. It is also represented that the petitioner is no more. If any legal heir or any other person is interested and if the cause of action survives, the legal heir

can make a representation as directed in the earlier order, without which this contempt petition is not entertainable and accordingly, the contempt petition stands dismissed, however with the liberty as aforesaid. 23-02-2026 NSL To

1. The Chairman, The TN Housing Board, EC Market Salai, Koyembedu, Chennai-107.

2. The Additional Secretary The Govt. of Tamil Nadu, Public (Political Pension) Department, Secretariat, St.George Fort, Chennai - 600 009.

3. The Special Secretary to Government (Expenditure), Finance Department, Fort St.George, Secretariat, Chennai-9.

D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.

NSL 23-02-2026