Sundar v. Abdul Rahaman

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 11.03.2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN CMP No.31964 of 2025 in WA SR No.196218 of 2025 Sundar Petitioner/ appellant Vs

1. Abdul Rahaman S/O. Shahul Hameed, No.96, Gandadeeswaran Koil Street, Purasawalkkam, Chennai-84 2.The Commissioner HR And C.E. Department, Uthamar Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai-24 3.The Joint Commissioner HR And C.E. Department, Uthamar Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai-24 4.The Executive Officer Arulmigu Gangadheeswarar Thirukoil, Purasawakkam, Chennai-84 Respondents For Appellant:

Mr.V.S.Venkatesh https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Heard on the application for grant of leave.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant/3rd party submits that he is the owner of the property at No.95, (wrongly mentioned as 96 in the petition), New No.22, Gangadeeswarar Kovil Street, Purasawalkkam, Chennai 600 084, and that the order passed by the learned Single Judge is directly affecting the rights of the applicant.

3. For the reasons stated in the application, the application seeking leave is allowed.

4. Registry is directed to number the writ appeal and list for admission next week.

(SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CJ.) (G.ARUL MURUGAN, J.) 11.03.2026 TAR https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis