G.Ramalingam v. The Inspector Of Police
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 11.12.2025
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA W.P.(Crl.)No.1592 of 2025 G.Ramalingam ... Petitioner Vs.
1.
The Inspector of Police, Muthandikuppam Police Station, Cuddalore District.
The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Panruti Taluk, Cuddalore District.
The Taluk Surveyor, Taluk Office, Panruti Taluk, Cuddalore District.
Santhi ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition (Criminal) is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Mandamus or direction in the nature of writ, to direct the first respondent to give police protection to measure and survey the land situated at Survey No.241/15D and 241/15E to the extent of 7 cents at Muthandikuppam, Panruti Taluk, Cuddalore District, by considering the petitioner's representations dated 17.11.2025. 1/5
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Vijyakumar For R1 to R3 : Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan Additional Public Prosecutor
O R D E R
The present Writ Petition (Criminal) has been filed seeking a direction to the first respondent to provide police protection to measure and survey his land, by considering the petitioner's representations dated 17.11.2025.
Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor takes notice on behalf of respondents 1 to 3. In view of the consent expressed by the learned counsel on either side, this Writ Petition (Criminal) is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. Notice to the fourth respondent is dispensed with inasmuch as no order prejudicial to her interest is passed. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor, on instructions. submitted that earlier, the petitioner had given a representation dated 18.10.2025 seeking police protection to survey his land at Survey No.241/15D and 241/5E situated at Muthandikuppam, Panruti Taluk, 2/5
Cuddalore District. Based on the said representation, the respondent police provided police protection and the survey was conducted by the Surveyor and the VAO on 10.11.2025 in the presence of the fourth respondent, who had also raised objection thereto. However, the petitioner had subsequently given another representation dated 17.11.2025 seeking the same relief. 5.
Taking note of the submissions made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor that the petitioner's earlier representation for the very same relief had already been considered and appropriate police protection was provided, this Court is of the view that no further orders are required in this case.
6.
Accordingly, this Writ Petition (Criminal) stands closed. No costs.
11.12.2025 ham 3/5
To 1.
The Inspector of Police, Muthandikuppam Police Station, Cuddalore District.
The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Panruti Taluk, Cuddalore District.
The Taluk Surveyor, Taluk Office, Panruti Taluk, Cuddalore District.
The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.
4/5
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA , J.
ham 11.12.2025 5/5