← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/33844/2025dismissed

T.C.Rajamohan v. The State Rep. By The Inspector Of Police,

2025-12-11Honourable Mr.Justice K.Rajasekar5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 11.12.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR 1.T.C.Rajamohan

2. Ravichandiran

3. K.B.Karthikeyan ... Petitioners Vs.

State By, Inspector of Police, Katpadi Police Station, Vellore District.

Crime No.303 of 2025 ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.303 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police.

For Petitioner :

Mr.K.Balaji For Respondent :

M/s.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

O R D E R

The petitioner herein apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 309(4), 351(2) of BNS read with Section 4 of Women Harassment Act, 2002 in Crime No.303 of 2025, on the file of the respondent Police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The allegation against the petitioner is that he is the father of the defacto complainant. It is alleged that, after securing an order in his favour for retaining the property, in which the defacto complainant and her family members were residing, the petitioner went to the said property along with his henchmen, and at his instigation, the other accused attacked the defacto complainant and caused severe injuries, including fracture. It is further alleged that they also demolished the house using a JCB. Hence, the present case.

3. It is seen that, earlier this Court dismissed the petitioner's bail petition in Crl.O.P.No.28851 of 2025 on 24.10.2025 by stating the following

reasons:

Considering the manner in which the occurrence had taken place, and the fact that the victim who is a lady and the daughter of the petitioner, sustained grievous injuries, and that the alleged occurrence had taken place at the instigation of the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Now, without any change in circumstances, present petition is filed. Hence, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. Accordingly, this Criminal Original petition is dismissed. 11.12.2025 sma

To 1.Inspector of Police, Katpadi Police Station, Vellore District.

2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

K.RAJASEKAR, J.

sma 11.12.2025