Kalaivanan v. State Rep.By, The Inspector Of Police,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 10-12-2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Kalaivanan Petitioner Vs State rep.by, The Inspector of Police, W2, AWPS Pallavaram Police Station, Chengalpattu District. Cr.No.44/2025.

Respondent(s) PRAYER Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail in the event of the arrest by the respondent police W-2 AWPS Pallavaram, Chengalpattu District for an alleged offence u/s.11(1),12 of POCSO Act in Cr.No.44 of 2025.

For Petitioner(s):

No Appearance For Respondent(s):

Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

ORDER

The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 11(1), 12 of POCSO Act, in Cr.No.44 of 2025, on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail.

2. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.

3. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner stating that the petitioner sexually harassed and attempted to molest the victim minor girl.

4. Considering the serious nature of the allegations of sexual harassment and attempt to molest a minor girl, and in the absence of any representation on behalf of the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 10-12-2025 gbi Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes

To 1.State rep.by, The Inspector of Police, W2, AWPS Pallavaram Police Station, Chengalpattu District. Cr.No.44/2025.

2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

K.RAJASEKAR J.

gbi CRL OP No. 33718 of 10-12-2025