Boson Infra India Private Limited v. The Commissioner Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 18-12-2025

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Boson Infra India Private Limited, Rep. by its HR S.Sathishkumar ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1.The Commissioner of Police, No. 132, Commissioner Office Building, EVK Sampath Road, Vepery, Chennai- 600 007.

2.The Joint Commissioner of Police, South Zone, Police Office Street, Binny Road, Nazarethpuram, Gandhi Nagar, Ramapuram, Chennai - 600 016.

3.The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Bharathi Salai, Andavar Nagar, Thiruvalluvar Nagar, Ramapuram, Chennai - 600 089 4.The Inspector of Police, R-11, Rayala Nagar Police Station, Bharathi Salai, Andavar Nagar, Thiruvalluvar Nagar, Ramapuram, Chennai 600 089.

..Respondent(s) PRAYER Writ Petition (Crl.) filed under Art. 226 of Constitution of India, seeking to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 1 to 4 to conduct a detailed enquiry by considering the petitioner's representation dated 29.11.2025 and initiate appropriate action.

For Petitioner(s):

Mr. J.Preetam For Respondent(s):

Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan, Additional Public Prosecutor __________Page 1 of 4

ORDER

This Writ Petition (Crl.) has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents 1 to 4 to conduct a detailed enquiry by considering the petitioner's representation dated 29.11.2025 and initiate appropriate action.

2. Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for petitioner would submit that the petitioner is a construction company and they are inducted in laying storm water drainage project near Ramapuram Main Road. While so, on 27.09.2025 somebody had committed theft of 66 ductile iron grating worth of Rs.2,11,200/-. Hence, the petitioner had given a complaint on 03.11.2025. Subsequently, while verifying CCTV footage, it was found that the theft was committed by one K. Rajesh. Whereas the respondents have not conducted a proper investigation and not taken any action against the said Rajesh.

3.Per contra, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for respondents 1 to 4 would submit that based on the complaint given by the petitioner dated 03.11.2025 as if some persons had committed theft of 66 ductile iron grating, a case in crime No.349 of 2025 was registered for an offence under Sec.303 (2) of B.N.S. He would further submit that since the petitioner has not named any person in his complaint, the name of the accused was not mentioned in the F.I.R. Further, he would submit that only later, by representation dated 29.11.2025, the petitioner had given a piece of information about one Rajesh. __________Page 2 of 4

He would further submit that due enquiry would be conducted and if necessary, the said Rajesh will be added as an accused in the F.I.R. and proper investigation will be conducted.

4. Recording his submissions, this Writ Petition (Crl.) stands disposed of. No costs.

18-12-2025 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order RPP To 1.The Commissioner of Police, No. 132, Commissioner Office Building, EVK Sampath Road, Vepery, Chennai- 600 007.

2.The Joint Commissioner of Police, South Zone, Police Office Street, Binny Road, Nazarethpuram, Gandhi Nagar, Ramapuram, Chennai - 600 016. 3.The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Bharathi Salai, Andavar Nagar, Thiruvalluvar Nagar, Ramapuram, Chennai - 600 089 4.The Inspector of Police, R-11, Rayala Nagar Police Station, Bharathi Salai, Andavar Nagar, Thiruvalluvar Nagar, Ramapuram, Chennai 600 089.

5. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras, __________Page 3 of 4

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA J.

RPP 18-12-2025 __________Page 4 of 4