Sudhakar v. State Rep By Inspector Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 02.01.2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Sudhakar ... Petitioner/A3 Vs.

The State Rep. By, The Inspector of Police, Villupuram Taluk Police Station, Villupuram District.

Crime No.727 of 2025 ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest in Crime No.727 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police.

For Petitioner :

Mr. A.M.Esakkiappan For Respondent :

M/s. J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Criminal Side)

O R D E R

The petitioner herein apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 296(b), 132, 121(1), 127, 109(1), 303(2) & 351(3) of BNS in Crime No.727 of 2025, on the file of the respondent Police, seek anticipatory bail. 1/4

2. The case of the prosecution is that based on the secret information, the defacto complainant who is the Sub Inspector of Police, Villupuram Taluk Police Station, went to the house of one Sudhagar, who is absconding accused in the sand theft case in Crime No.610 of 2025 of Villupuram Taluk Police Station. When the complainant tried to arrest the said Sudhagar, he abused him in filthy language and also attacked him with screw driver on his neck, chest with an intention to murder him and caused injuries to him. The further prosecution of the case is that the family members of the said Sudhagar namely A2 to A5 including the petitioners herein, prevented the police official from discharging his official duty and also caused damages to the Walkie Talkie of the police official. Hence, the case.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that, co-accused were granted bail to the petitioner and hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that, injured has been discharged from the hospital, however he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner has 7 previous cases. 2/4

5. Considering the allegation as against the petitioner that he has caused injuries to the Police Officials while they were discharging their duties and the bad antecedents of the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 02.01.2026 sma 3/4

K.RAJASEKAR, J.

sma To 1.The Inspector of Police, Villupuram Taluk Police Station, Villupuram District.

2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

02.01.2026 4/4