← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/34627/2025dismissed

M. Suresh v. State Rep By Inspector Of Police

2026-01-08Honourable Mr.Justice K.Rajasekar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 08.01.2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR CRL OP No.34627 of 2025 M.Suresh C/o.Manickam ... Petitioner/ Accused -1 Vs The State Rep. By, The Inspector of Police, Thanipadi Police Station, Tiruvannamalai - 606 708.

(Crime No. 206 of 2025) ... Respondent/Complainant PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, pleased to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest by the respondent in Crime No.206 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police.

For Petitioner : Mr. M.Gunasekarn For Respondent : M/s.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ******

O R D E R

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 303(2), 326(a) of BNS Act, 2023, and r/w 21(1) Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, in Crime No.206 of 2025 on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail.

1/4

2.

The allegation against this petitioner is that, the petitioner joined hands with the other accused and involved in illegal quarrying and transportation of sand, using lorry from Mothakkal forest area and hence, this case.

3.

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and they have permit to take from the Mothakkal forest area and he has also produced a copy of the same to the Court; and is ready to co-operate with the investigation and also ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court, hence sought for anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4.

The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent while opposing the anticipatory bail to the petitioner reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the petitioner along with the co-accused illegally transported the sand from the Mothakkal forest area. She would further submit that the petitioner have permit to transport sand only from Muthalaimadai Eri and not from Mothakkal Forest area. 5.

Considering the submissions made on both sides and perused 2/4

the materials available on record.

6.

Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, gravity of offence, nature and quantity involved in this case and the fact that the permit is to transport from Muthalamadai Eri and not from the Mothakkal Forest area, that it is the case of illegal sand quarrying and also caused damage to forest area. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

7.

Accordingly, this criminal original petition stands dismissed. 08.01.2026 ssa To

1. The Judicial Magistrate, Thanrampattu.

2. The Inspector of Police, Thanipadi Police Station, Tiruvannamalai - 606 708.

(Crime No.206 of 2025)

3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

3/4

K. RAJASEKAR, J.

ssa Crl.O.P. No.34627 of 2025 08.01.2026 4/4