Saravanan v. The State Rep By, The Inspector Of Police
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 15.12.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR CRL OP NO.34285 of 2025 1.Saravanan 2.Sathya Petitioners Vs The State Represented by The Inspector of Police, T-12, Chrompet Police Station, Chrompet, Chennai.
Crime No.263 of 2025.
Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioners on bail in Crime No.263 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioners : Mr.J.Senthil Kumar For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl.side)
ORDER
The petitioners, who were arrested and remanded to judicial
custody on 07.11.2025 for the alleged offence punishable under Section 126(2), 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 324(4), 311 and 351(3) of BNS, 2023 in Crime No.263 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.
2. The allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners joined hands with other accused attacked the defacto complaint with wooden log and also taken away Rs.3,500/- at knife point, and damaged the properties of the house. Hence the case.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners herein ranked as A2 and A3, and some other accused have already been arrested and released on bail. The petitioners is in custody from 07.11.2025 and are ready to abide by any condition that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays for grant of bail to the petitioners.
4. However, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that the 1st petitioner is having 10 previous cases including two cases under 302 IPC and other grievous offences; similarly, the 2nd petitioner is also having 9 previous cases, including 3 cases under NDPS Act and other IPC offences. Hence, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
5. I have considered the submissions made on both sides and perused the records, which revealed that the petitioners joined together and attacked the defacto complainant with wooden log and also snatched away the money. It is also reported that the petitioners are having bad antecedents of 10 and 9 previous cases respectively. Hence, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.
15.12.2025 mpa To 1.The Inspector of Police, T-12, Chrompet Police Station, Chrompet, Chennai.
2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.
K.RAJASEKAR, J., mpa CRL OP NO.34285 of 2025 15.12.2025