← Library
Madras High CourtCRP/442/2026disposed of

Pooja Premraj v. B. Rajasingh Gauthaman

2026-02-05Honourable Mr.Justice S. Sounthar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 05-02-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR In both CRP's Pooja Premraj ..Petitioner(s) Vs B. Rajasingh Gauthaman ..Respondent(s) Prayer in CRP.No.442 of 2026 Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the II Additional Family Court at Chennai to dispose of the petition in HMOP No.3655 of 2024 within a stipulated time as framed by this Court.

Prayer in CRP.No.446 of 2026 Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the II Additional Family Court at Chennai to dispose of the petition in HMOP No.576 of 2023 within a stipulated time as framed by this Court.

For Petitioner(s):

in both CRP's M/s.C. Alagu Bhavani for M/s.K.Suthan COMMON ORDER These civil revision petitions are filed seeking a direction to II Additional Family Court, Chennai to dispose of the original OP's in HMOP.Nos.3655 of 2024 and 576 of 2023 respectively.

2. HMOP.No.3655 of 2024 has been filed by the respondent against the petitioner seeking divorce on the ground of cruelty. HMOP.No.576 of 2023 has been filed by the petitioner against the respondent seeking divorce on the ground of cruelty. Both the petitions are taken up for hearing simultaneously.

3. It is seen from the e-court online status filed in the typed set of papers, the pleadings of the parties are completed and OP's are getting adjourned for enquiry from March 2025. In HMOP.No.576 of 2023, the petitioner examined herself as PW1 and the matter has been adjourned for PW1 cross from March 2025 onwards. As far as HMOP.No.3655 of 2024 is concerned, the respondent/husband failed to enter the box in spite of several directions issued by the court to file proof affidavit as early as 29.07.2025. The family court directed the respondent to file proof affidavit on the next date of hearing with condition that in case of default, the OP will be dismissed. In spite of such direction, the respondent has not filed his proof affidavit and commenced the enquiry.

4. Taking into consideration the pleadings of the parties were completed long back and OP's are adjourned for the past nine months for the purpose of enquiry, this Court is inclined to direct the family court to dispose of both the OP's as expeditiously as possible.

5. With this direction, these civil revision petitions are disposed of. No costs.

05-02-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order nr To The II Additional Family Court, Chennai.

S.SOUNTHAR, J.

nr 05-02-2026