Tamilarasan v. The State Rep By, The Inspector Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 15.12.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Crl.O.P.Nos.34165 and 34181 of 2025 Tamilarasan ... Petitioner (Crl.OP.No.34165 of 2025) Ajith Kumar ... Petitioner (Crl.OP.No.34181 of 2025) Vs.

State rep by The Inspector of Police, Sevvapet Police Station, Thiruvallur District.

... Respondent (in both Crl.Ops') COMMON PRAYER : Criminal Original Petitions filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, to enlarge the petitioners on bail, in the event of their arrest in connection with Crime No.300 of 2025 on the file of the respondent.

For Petitioners : Mr.D.Ilayaraja For Respondent : Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl. Side) 1/6

COMMON ORDER The petitioners who apprehend arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 126(2), 296(b), 118(1), 324(4) and 351(3) of BNS (Sections 341, 294(b), 323, 425 and 506(ii) of IPC) in Cr.No.300 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The allegation against the petitioners is that, due to previous enmity, the petitioners went to the place of occurrence and attacked the defacto complainant and also damaged the car and other properties worth about Rs.5,000/-, which led to the registration of the FIR. Hence, the present case.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and have not committed any such offence as alleged by the prosecution. Hence, he prayed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and reported that the petitioner namely Ajith Kumar in Crl.O.P.No.34181 of 2025 has two previous cases and the petitioner namely Tamilarasan in Crl.O.P.No.34165 of 2025 has no previous cases. However, he opposed the grant of 2/6

anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

6. I have considered the submissions made on both sides and perused the materials available on record.

7. Considering the nature of the allegations and the submissions made on both sides, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, subject to certain conditions

8. Accordingly, each of the petitioners are directed to deposit a sum of Rs.2,000/- to the credit of Crime No.300 of 2025 before the Trial Court. On such deposit and production of proof, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date on which the order copy made, before the learned Judicial Magistrate-II, Thiruvallur on condition that each of the petitioners shall execute separate bonds for a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction learned Magistrate concerned, and on further condition that: (a) If the petitioners fails to surrender before the concerned Magistrate within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, this order shall stand automatically cancelled;

(b) The sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the application for surety ship (Judicial 3/6

Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019]'. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of identify proofs to ensure their identity; (c) The petitioners shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation;

(d) The petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; (e) The petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial:

(f) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate actions against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on anticipatory bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji v. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; (g)If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS Act.

15.12.2025 Vv 4/6

To

1. The Judicial Magistrate-II, Thiruvallur

2. The Inspector of Police, Sevvapet Police Station, Thiruvallur District.

3.The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras, Chennai 600 104.

5/6

K.RAJASEKAR , J.

Vv Crl.O.P.Nos.34165 and 34181 of 2025 15.12.2025 6/6