Saarangi @ Elumalai v. The State Rep.By, The Inspector Of Police,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 15-12-2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR CRL OP NO.34263 of 2025 Saarangi @ Elumalai Petitioner Vs The State Represented by The Inspector of Police, Vanapuram Police Station, Vanapuram, Tiruvannamalai District.
Crime No.111 of 2025.
Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner in Crime No.111 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner:
M/s.B.Yoga Priya For Respondent:
Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl.side)
ORDER
The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody
on 08.10.2025 for the alleged offence punishable under Section 103(1) of BNS, in Crime No.111 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.
2. The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner quarrelled with the deceased. During the funeral ceremony, the petitioner allegedly attacked the deceased with liquor bottle and stabbed him as a result of which, the deceased succumbed to loss of blood. Hence, a complaint was lodged and the petitioner was arrested.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody from 08.10.2025 and that he is ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed for grant of bail to the petitioner.
4. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the petitioner is not having any previous case and that the investigation is still pending. However, he opposes to grant bail to the petitioner.
5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, the nature of the allegations, the manner in which the alleged occurrence took place and the motive behind the occurrence, and also
taking into account the period of incarceration and that the petitioner is not having any previous antecedents, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.
6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on her executing a bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thandarampet, and on further conditions that:- [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;
[b] the petitioner shall report before the concerned Court daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of three weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation.
[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with the
evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself, as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]; [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.
15.12.2025 drl Note:
1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.
2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code.
To 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Thandarampet.
2.The Inspector of Police, Vanapuram Police Station, Vanapuram, Tiruvannamalai District.
3.The Superintendent, Central Prison, Vellore.
4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.
K.RAJASEKAR, J., drl CRL OP NO.34263 of 2025 15.12.2025