Subramani v. State Represented By The Inspector Of Police
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 16-12-2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR CRL OP NO.34450 of 2025 Subramani ... Petitioner/ Accused Vs The State rep. by, The Inspector of Police, Kondapalayam Police Station, Ranipet District.
(Crime No.133 of 2025) ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to grant bail to the petitioner/accused in Crime No.133 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner(s) :
Mr. R. Dinesh Kumar For Respondent(s) :
Mr. A. Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl. Side) ******* 1/4
ORDER
The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 28.05.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 329(3), 126(2), 296(b), 109 and 103(1) of BNS in Crime No.133 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.
2.
The case of the prosecution is that, the petitioner herein and the defacto complainant are residing in the same village; that it is alleged that the petitioner herein had stalked the defacto complainant's daughter; that when the same was objected by the defacto complainant's daughter, the petitioner got enraged, trespassed into the defacto complainant's house and assaulted the defacto complainant's daughter with knife; that when the defacto complainant's sister's daughter tried to prevent the petitioner, she was also brutally assaulted by the petitioner; that due to which, both the victims in this case sustained grievous bleeding injuries; that on hearing the screaming of the victims, the neighbours broke open the house door, caught hold the petitioner herein and handed over him to the respondent police; that the defacto complainant's daughter in this case died on the spot and the other victim had sustained severe injuries and admitted in hospital. Hence, this case.
2/4
3.
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is a young boy aged about 19 years and has no previous antecedents; that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 28.05.2025; and that the petitioner is ready to abide by any condition that may be imposed by this Court, hence prays to grant bail to the petitioner. 4.
The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent while opposing the bail to the petitioner reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that there are totally two victims in this case, one of the victim died and the other had sustained grievous injuries; that the investigation of this case was completed and final report filed. 5.
Considering the submissions made on both sides, grave nature of offence, the manner in which the occurrence is said to have taken place, the petitioner herein is alleged to have caused death to one of the victim instantaneously by stabbing her repeatedly using knife and caused injuries to the other victim and if the petitioner is enlarged on bail, there is possibility of tampering with the witnesses, hence this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
3/4
K. RAJASEKAR, J.
stn 6.
Accordingly, this criminal original petition stands dismissed. 16.12.2025 stn To
1. The Inspector of Police, Kondapalayam Police Station, Ranipet District.
(Crime No.133 of 2025)
2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.
Crl.O.P. No.34450 of 2025 4/4