← Library
Madras High CourtArb Appln/1685/2025disposed of

Tata Capital Ltd v. Srinivasan N

2026-01-27Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh2 pages

Arb Appln No. 1685 of 2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 27-01-2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH Arb Appln No. 1685 of 2025 Tata Capital Ltd By its Associate Legal Remedial R.Kamalakannan Having its office at 1st Floor, Centennial Square 6A Dr.Ambedkar Salai, Kodambakkam Chennai 600 024 Applicant(s) Vs Srinivasan N Respondent(s) PRAYER To pass an order Appointing Mr.Abish DJ, employed as employee currently designated as Legal Manager in the Applicant company having his office at First Floor, Centennial Square Dr.Ambedkar Salai, Kodambakkam, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600 024 as Receiver to seize and deliver the asset MARUTI DZIRE ZXI P BSIV bearing Engine No.K12MN2047290 Chassis No. MA3CZF63SHH 169822, Reg.No.TN05BM5707 situated No.5, G-Block 8th Main Road, Ponniyamman Medu, Thanigachalam Nagar, Land Mark- Na Chennai, Kolathur, Chennai 600 010, Tamil Nadu or wherever it is found morefully described hereunder, with police aid or break open the premises from wherever found and handover the same to the applicant For Applicant(s):

Mr.N.K.Vanan For Respondent(s):

No appearance

ORDER

This application has been filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, for appointment of a Receiver to seize the subject vehicle in the custody of the respondent or wherever found, if necessary, with police protection and by breaking open the premises and deliver the same to the applicant.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Arb Appln No. 1685 of 2025 N. ANAND VENKATESH, J.

gya 2.When the application came up for hearing on 16.12.2025, this Court, on carefully going through the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of the application, thought it fit to order notice to the respondent to ascertain as to whether the respondent will be willing to settle the dispute. 3.Though the respondent has entered appearance through a Counsel and the name of the counsel has also been printed in the cause list, no representation on the side of the respondent, when the matter was called. The whereabouts of the vehicle is also not known. Hence, the apprehension of the applicant that the respondent is attempting to secret the vehicle is prima facie established. 4.In view of the above, Mr.Abish DJ, Legal Manager, is appointed as Receiver for seizing the subject vehicle from the respondent or wherever it is found and by breaking open the premises, if required, with police aid. This application is disposed of in the above terms. 27-01-2026 gya Arb Appln No. 1685 of 2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis