Masthan v. State Rep.By Its, The Inspector Of Police,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 16.12.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Crl.O.P.No.34361 of 2025 Masthan ... Petitioner Vs.
State rep by its The Inspector of Police, T-12, Poonamalle Police Station, Avadi District.
... Respondent (Cr.No.792 of 2025) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of arrest in Cr.No.792 of 2025 on the file of the Inspector of Police, T-12, Poonamalle Police Station, Avadi District.
For Petitioner : Mr.C.Raghavan For Respondent : Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
ORDER
The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Section 126(2), 296(b), 115(2), 309(4), 311 and 351(3) of BNS,2023 in Cr.No.792 of 2025, on the file of the respondent police. seeks anticipatory bail. 1/5
2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner, along with the other accused, had attacked the defacto complainant with knife and caused injury to him, which led to the registration of the FIR. Hence, the present case.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready and abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Therefore, prayed for the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and reported that A1 and A2 were arrested and still in custody. He also reported that the petitioner is ranked as A3 and having four previous cases, out of which, 2 cases under NDPS Act, one under Section 379 IPC and other case under Section 309 of IPC. However, he opposed the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
5. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record.
6. Though four previous cases reported against the petitioner, FIR reveals that no serious injury sustained by the defacto complainant, this 2/5
Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to certain conditions.
7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on her appearance within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date on which the order copy made, before the learned Judicial Magistrate-II, Poonamalle on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction learned Magistrate concerned, and on further condition that:
(a) If the petitioner fails to surrender before the concerned Magistrate within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, this order shall stand automatically cancelled;
(b) The sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the application for surety ship (Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019]'. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of identify proofs to ensure their identity; (c) The petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of three weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation;
3/5
(d) The petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; (e) The petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial:
(f) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate actions against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on anticipatory bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji v. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; (g)If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS Act.
16.12.2025 Vv To
1. The Judicial Magistrate-II, Poonamalle
2. The Inspector of Police, T-12, Poonamalle Police Station, Avadi District.
3.The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras, Chennai 600 104.
4/5
K.RAJASEKAR , J.
Vv Crl.O.P.No.34361 of 2025 16.12.2025 5/5