Florence Durairaj v. The Revenue Divisional Officer
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 17-12-2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Florence Durairaj Petitioner(s) Vs
1. The Revenue Divisional Officer Central Chennai Division, Chennai District.
2.The Tahsildar Ayanavaram Taluk, Chennai District.
3.Doreen Hephzibah Miriam Respondent(s) PRAYER directing the respondents to transfer the Patta in the name of the petitioner and 3rd Respondent with respect to the property and issue computerised patta for property in T.S. No.64/3, Block No.14, Veerasamy 3rd Street, Ayanavaram, Chennai, Considering the petition dated 11.04.2025 and as per the enquiry dated 30.10.2025 in Na.Ka. No.A2/4545/2025, dated on 11/10/2025 on the file of the first respondent, within a time frame as may be fixed by this Honble Court. For Petitioner(s):
Mr. P.Raja For Respondent(s):
Mr.D.Ravichander, Spl.G.P. for R1 and R2 R3-d/w
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the official respondents to transfer the patta in the name of the petitioner and in the name of the third respondent for the property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, based on the petitioner's representation dated 11.04.2025, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.
2.Mr.D.Ravichander, learned Special Government Pleader accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2. He would submit that pursuant to the aforesaid representation dated 11.04.2025, enquiry has been commenced by the first respondent, but till date, no final order has been passed. 3.Since no adverse order is passed against the third respondent, notice to the third respondent is dispensed with.
4.No prejudice would be caused to the official respondents if the petitioner's representation dated 11.04.2025 seeking for transfer of patta in the name of the petitioner and in the name of the third respondent for the property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, is considered, on merits and in accordance with law, after hearing the objections of the neighbouring
land owners, if any and any other third party whom the first respondent deems fit to enquire, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 5.This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's representation.
6.For the foregoing reasons, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the first respondent to pass final orders, on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner's representation dated 11.04.2025 seeking for transfer of patta for the property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, in her name and in the name of the third respondent, after hearing the objections of the neighbouring land owners if any and also any other third party whom the first respondent deems fit to enquire, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. 17-12-2025 vga
To 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer Central Chennai Division, Chennai District.
2.The Tahsildar Ayanavaram Taluk, Chennai District.
ABDUL QUDDHOSE J.
vga 17-12-2025