← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/35071/2025dismissed

Appun @ Syed Ali v. The State Rep.By The Inspector Of Police

2026-01-02Honourable Mr.Justice K.Rajasekar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 02-01-2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR

1. Appun @ Syed Ali S/o.Abdul Sambath, No.30/4, I st Street, Bazar Road, Mylapore, Chennai 600 004 Petitioner(s) Vs

1. The State rep.by The Inspector of Police E-1, Mylapore Police Station, Chennai Crime NO.567 of 2025 Respondent(s) PRAYER To enlarge the petitioner on Anticipatory Bail in the event of his arrest of the respondent police in connection with Crime No.567 of 2025 pending investigation on the file of respondent police. For Petitioner(s):

Prakash M For Respondent(s):

M/S.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

ORDER

The petitioner, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police

for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 115(2), 324(2), 281 and 351(3) of BNS and 4 of TNPHW Act in Crime No.567 of 2025, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner joined hands with other accused threatened the witness in the murder case (defacto complainant's daughter) and also threatened the defacto complainant. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that a false complaint has been lodged since the petitioner has some previous cases, and for the purpose of detaining him, this case has been registered. Therefore, he prays for grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the petitioner is having 9 previous cases including a case of murder. Hence opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Considering the nature of the allegations and the fact that the petitioner has bad antecedents of 9 previous cases, and considering the fact that a witness in a criminal case has been threatened, if the petitioner is granted bail there is a

likelihood that he will indulge in similar offences, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.

02-01-2026 Mpa Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes To 1.The State rep.by The Inspector of Police E-1, Mylapore Police Station, Chennai Crime NO.567 of 2025 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

K.RAJASEKAR J.

mpa CRL OP No. 35071 of 02-01-2026