← Library
Madras High CourtCMP/366/2026dismissed

K.Vaidyanathan v. Sai Prasad Suresh

2026-02-03Honourable Mr.Justice S. Sounthar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 03-02-2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR in CRP Sr.No.200736 of 2025

1. K.Vaidyanathan, S/o Late K.Kalimuthu, No 15, Chakrapani Street, West Mambalam, Chennai - 600 033.

2. Sai Abhinaya, D/o. K.Vaidyanathan, 15, Chakrapani Street, West Mambalam, Chennai - 33.

Rep by her Power Agent K.Vaidyanathan S/o. Late. K. Kalimuthu, 15, Chakrapani Street, West Mambalam, Chennai - 33.

3. M/s. K.K. Builders, Rep by its Partners, 15, Chakrapani Street, West Mambalam, Chennai 33 Petitioners Vs

1. Sai Prasad Suresh, S/o. R.Suresh Kumar, 2015, Dindle Drive, APT 101 Virginia, V.A 23555, USA.

2.S.Prashanth, S/o. R.Suresh Kumar, Flat No. F2, L.S. Apartments, 43/1 Janakiraman Street West, Mambalam, Chennai - 33.

(1) and (2) rep by their POA Dr.Latha Suresh 3.R.Suresh Kumar, S/o. Late. N. Ramachandran, Flat No. F2, L.S. Apartments, 43/1 Janakiraman Street, West Mambalam, Chennai - 33.

Respondents PRAYER: This Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Order III Rule 2 R/W Section 151 of Civil Procedure Code to recognize me as a Power agent of the 2nd petitioner herein in the above Civil Revision Petition. For Petitioners:

Ms.Lakshmi Vijayakumar

ORDER

It is seen from the General Power of Attorney executed by the second petitioner in favour of the first petitioner that the second petitioner has not given any power to the first petitioner to represent her in legal proceedings involving her immovable properties. The second petitioner has authorised the first petitioner only to represent her in legal proceedings involving her bank accounts.

2. Therefore, the Power of Attorney dated 22.03.2018 produced by the petitioners will not enable the first petitioner to represent the second petitioner in legal proceedings involving her immovable properties.

3. In view of the above, the petition to recognize the first petitioner as power agent of second petitioner is dismissed.

4. The Registry is directed to return the Revision papers to the learned counsel for the petitioners. It is always open to the petitioners to cure the defects and re-present the Revision Petition, in accordance with law. 03-02-2026 Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes Lpp

S.SOUNTHAR J.

Lpp in CRP Sr.No.200736 of 2025 03-02-2026