Saravanan v. The State Rep By,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 26-12-2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL Saravanan S/o.Siva Kumar, Res at 9, Syed Sathik Nagar, Mangadu, Chennai - 600122.
Petitioner(s) Vs The State rep by, Inspector of Police, T-12, Poonamallee Police Station, Chennai. Crime No.746 of 2025 Respondent(s) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.746 of 2025 on the file of the respondent. For Petitioner(s):
Mr.S. Senthil Kumar For Respondent(s):
Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar Government Advocate (crl.Side)
ORDER
The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 08.10.2025, for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 296(b), 115(2), 125, 309(4), 324(2), 311 and 351(3) of BNS, Act 2023 in Crime No. 746 of 2025, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused waylaid the defacto complainant and robbed a sum of Rs.3,500/- at knife point. Hence, the case.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He would submit that he has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the petitioner was arrested and is in judicial custody from 08.10.2025. Hence, he prayed for grant of bail to the petitioner.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police submitted that there are totally four accused in this case and the petitioner along with other accused waylaid the defacto complainant and robbed a sum of Rs.3,500/- at knife point. He also submits that there are 11 previous cases pending against the petitioner. Hence, he opposed to grant bail to the petitioner.
5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record including the First Information Report.
6. Considering the rival submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, the nature of the offences and the money involved in this case, considering the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner and also fact that co-accused was enlarged on bail, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the
petitioner, subject to certain conditions.
[a] Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, No.II, Poonamallee. and on further conditions that:- [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders.
[c] the petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, or of the commission of which he is suspected;
[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [e] the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence;
[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].
[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 BNS.
26.12.2025 nr Note:
1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.
2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code.
To
1. Judicial Magistrate, No.II, Poonamallee.
2. The Inspector of Police, T-12, Poonamallee Police Station, Chennai.
3.The Superintendent, Central Prison No.II, Puzhal, Chennai.
4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.
P.DHANABAL J.
nr CRL OP No. 35598 of 26-12-2025