Rajeshwari v. The Superintendent Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 30.12.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P.DHANABAL Crl.O.P.No. 36145 of 2025 Rajeshwari ... Petitioner

Versus

1.The Superintendent of Police, Salem, Salem District.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Aatur, Salem District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Thammampatty Police Station, Salem District.

... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to direct the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioner during the course of the investigation except due process of law.

For Petitioner : Mr.I.Sheik Mohamed For Respondents : Mr.S.Udaya Kumar Government Advocate (Crl. Side) 1/4

ORDER

When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondents would submit that based on the complaint of the de-facto complainant, who is none other than the mother-in-law of the petitioner, the respondent called the petitioner for enquiry, apart from that they have not harassed the petitioner.

2. Recording the same, this Criminal Original Petition is closed. 30.12.2025 smv 2/4

To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Salem, Salem District.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Aatur, Salem District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Thammampatty Police Station, Salem District.

4.The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras.

3/4

P. DHANABAL, J.

SMV/KKN Crl.O.P.No. 36145 of 2025 30.12.2025 4/4