← Library
Madras High CourtWP/31894/2018dismissed for nonprosecution

B.Narayanan v. The State Of Tamilnadu

2021-11-25Honourable Mr Justice Krishnan Ramasamy3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 25.11.2021 C O R A M THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY W.P.NO.31894 OF 2018 AND W.M.P.NO.37127 OF 2018 B.Narayanan ... Petitioner .Vs.

1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Chief Secretary to Government, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai - 9.

2. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Secretary to Government, Department of Food and Consumer, Fort St. George, Chennai - 9.

3. The District Collector, Vellore, Vellore District - 9.

4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ranipet, Vellore District - 9.

5. The Tahsildar, Arcot, Vellore District - 9.

6. The Block Development Officer Timiri, Arcot Taluk, Vellore District - 9.

7. The Chairman, National Commission for Human Rights, Manav Adhikar Bhavan, New Delhi - 110 023.

8. The Chairman, National Commission for Scheduled Castes, New Delhi - 110 003.

... Respondents

PRAYER:- Writ Petition filed under Section 226 of the Constitution of India, prayed for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, declaring that division of any village on caste basis into 'colony' and 'Ur' is unconstitutional with immediate effect and directing the first respondent herein to take necessary action in this regard and to create revenue and other records showing all villages in the State as a single unit without any caste based division such as 'colony' and 'Ur' and report compliance of the same before this Court.

For Petitioner :

No Appearance For R1 to R6 :

Mr.V.Namaran Additional Government Pleader

ORDER

When the matter was taken up for hearing on 07.02.2019, there was no representation for the petitioner and the matter stood adjourned by four weeks. Thereafter, it was listed on 13.03.2019, on which date, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner and again the matter was adjourned for four weeks. After that, the matter is listed only today i.e on 25.11.2021, today also there is no representation for the petitioner, which shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to show any more indulgence in granting adjournments, in the absence of any representation for the petitioner.

2. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VIII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar rst To 1.

The Chief Secretary to Government, The State of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai - 9.

2.

The Secretary to Government, The State of Tamil Nadu, Department of Food and Consumer, Fort St. George, Chennai - 9.

3.

The District Collector Vellore, Vellore District - 9.

4.

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ranipet, Vellore District - 9.

5.

The Tahsildar, Arcot, Vellore District - 9.

6.

The Block Development Officer, Timiri, Arcot Taluk, Vellore District - 9.

7.

The Chairman, National Commission for Human Rights, Manav Adhikar Bhavan, New Delhi - 110 023.

8.

The Chairman, National Commission for Scheduled Castes, New Delhi - 110 003.

+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.61975 W.P.NO.31894 OF 2018 AND W.M.P.NO.37127 OF 2018 GPL(CO) PBS/09/12/2021