Hayath John v. Aravindan

Cont.P.No.2239 of 2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 11.02.2021

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R. SURESH KUMAR Contempt Petition No.2239 of 2018 Hayath John .. Petitioner -VsThiru.Aravindan The Managing Director Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation Ltd., Salem Division-II, Bharathipuram Dharmapuri-5.

.. Respondents Prayer : Contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondent for his wilful and deliberate disobedience of the order and directions of this Hon'ble Court dated 18.12.2017 in W.P.No.27287/2003.

For Petitioner : Ms.Nandhini Hariparanthaman for M/s.R.Krishnaswamy For Respondent : Mr.D.Raghu, Standing Counsel

O R D E R

This Contempt Petition has been filed for the alleged disobedience of the orders of this Court dated 18.12.2017 made in W.P.No.27287 of 2003.

2. When this Contempt Petition came up for hearing on the last occasion ie., on 21.01.2021, it was submitted on behalf of the respondent that the orders of this Court has been complied with and the pay benefits payable to the petitioner had already been paid. However, the learned counsel for the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Cont.P.No.2239 of 2018 petitioner had submitted that, he has received instructions from the petitioner that, the petitioner had received only arrears of back wages, but the pay benefits under various other heads are yet to be received by him and therefore, in this regard he wanted to get instructions as to under what heads the amounts were not disbursed and that, he would intimate the same before this Court in the form of an affidavit. Accordingly, the case was adjourned twice.

3. Today when the case is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that, despite the best efforts by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner could not be contacted and in this regard the learned counsel reports no instructions.

4. In the said circumstances, in view of the categorical stand taken by the learned Standing Counsel that the orders of this Court dated 18.12.2017 since has been complied with, this Court is not inclined to retain this contempt petition for further adjudication. Accordingly, this Contempt Petition is closed. SD/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(COMM.CASES) kst //Certified to be true copy// Dated at Madras this the day of 2021. COURT OFFICER(O.S.) from 25th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing Certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.

GS/20/04/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/