← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/22806/2018disposed of

P M S Financiers, v. The Superintendent Of Police,

2018-09-26Honourable Mr Justice P. Rajamanickam2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED:26.09.2018

CORAM:

The Hon'ble Mr.Justice P. RAJAMANICKAM CRL.O.P.No.22806 of 2018 M/s.P.M.S.Financiers, Represented by Mr.Dinesh Kumar Managing partner .. Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Kanchipuram District, Kanchipuram.

2.Inspector of Police, Chengalpet Police Station, Kancheepuram -603 002.

3. Mr.K.Jayapal, .. Respondents PRAYER:

Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the first and second respondent to execute the Non Bailable warrant issued in C.C.No.2231 of 2016 on the file of the Hon'ble FTC-II Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai against the third respondent/accused within specified time.

For Petitioner : Mr.T.V.Suresh Kumar For Respondents : Ms.M.Prabhavathi Additional Public Prosecutor for R1&R2

O R D E R

This petition has been filed by the complainant to direct the first and second respondent to execute the Non Bailable warrant issued in C.C.No.2231 of 2016 on the file of the Hon'ble FTC-II Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai against the third respondent/accused within specified time.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner herein has filed a private complaint under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act against the third respondent and based on the said complaint, the learned 14th Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai has taken the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

case on file in C.C.No. 2232 of 2016 and tried the case. He further submitted that when the case was posted for defence side evidence, the third respondent not appeared and hence bailable warrant was issued on 10.07.2018, but, so far, the respondents 1 and 2 have not taken any steps to execute the said warrant and hence he requests to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to execute the said warrant at early.

3. The learned Public Prosecutor has submitted that two months time may be granted for executing the bailable warrant.

4. Considering the aforesaid submissions, the respondent No.2 is directed to execute bailable warrant within six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

5. With the aforesaid directions, this petition is disposed of.

vsn/vv Sd/- Deputy Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To

1. FTC-II Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai

2. The Superintendent of Police, Kanchipuram District, Kanchipuram.

3. Inspector of Police, Chengalpet Police Station, Kancheepuram -603 002.

4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai.

+2ccs to M/s.Genicon and Associates Advocate S.R.No.67257 KR/08/11/2018 CRL.O.P.No.22806 of 2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/