← Library
Madras High CourtA/7952/2018ordered

Cholamandalam Investment And Finance Company Limited, v. Sandeep Tv

2019-01-23Honourable Mr Justice M. Govindaraj2 pages

Application No.7952 of 2018 PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.

By order, dated 23.01.2019, this Court appointed Mr.V.Sithannan, Advocate as Advocate Commissioner to seize and possess the vehicle in question.

2. Pursuant to the warrant of commission issued by this Court to seize the vehicle, it is today represented by the learned counsel appearing for the applicant that the subject asset has been seized on 18.05.2019 and handed over to the applicant company by the Advocate Commissioner. He would also point out that arbitration proceedings have been initiated and are pending.

3. Though notice has been served on the respondent and his name has been printed in the cause list, none appears on behalf of the respondent.

4. In the above circumstances and since nothing further survives in this application, the same stands closed. However, it is made clear that the vehicle shall not be alienated/altered/ encumbered without orders in this regard from the Arbitrator. Needless to say, as and when an award is passed, the applicant shall be at liberty to proceed as per law.

19.09.2019 rsi http://www.judis.nic.in

PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.

rsi Application No.7952 of 2018 19.09.2019 http://www.judis.nic.in