S.Palanisamy v. Kamala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED :16.11.2018

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH C.R.P. (NPD) No. 3648 of 2018 S.Palanisamy

...Petitioner

Vs Kamala

...Respondent

Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed Under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 03.07.2018 in I.A.No.118 of 2015 in O.S.No.548 of 2000 on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Pondicherry.

For Petitioner : Mr.K.S.Vaithianathan

O R D E R

The reason assigned in the application filed under Section 5 of Limitation act, 1963 cannot be deemed to be a sufficient reason for the purpose of condoning the delay. The vague averment therein that due to illness, he was unable to take steps, cannot be deemed to be a sufficient reason as contemplated under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. http://www.judis.nic.in

M.S.RAMESH, J.

hvk

2. As such, I do not find any infirmity in the order passed by the trial Court dismissing the petitioner's application to condone the inordinate delay of 4371 days, on the ground that the same has not been properly explained.

3. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition stands dismissed. No costs. 16.11.2018 Index:Yes/No Speaking Order: Yes/No hvk To The Principal Sub Court, Pondicherry.

C.R.P. (NPD) No. 3648 of 2018 http://www.judis.nic.in