M/S.Sisco Latex Pvt Ltd v. Sisco Latex Labour Union

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 29.03.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN W.P.No. 26283 of 2018 and WMP. No. 30528 of 2018 M/s. SISCO Latex Pvt. Ltd., represented by its Authorised Signatory Mrs. Latha Madhavan No. 33, Gopalan Kadai Road, Kurumbapet Village, Pondicherry - 605009.

...Petitioner

-Vs1. SISCO Latex Labour Union represented by its Secretary, No.3, Gangaiamman Koil Street, Dharmapuri, Puducherry-605 009.

2. The Sub Inspector of Police, Mettupalayam Police Station, Puducherry.

...Respondents

Prayer:

Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent herein to provide police protection for the moving of the machineries more specifically described in the schedule to the petition from the petitioner's factory situated at 33 Gopalan Kadai Road, Kurumbapet Village, Pondicherry 605 009, in the light of the 2nd representation dated 28.08.2017 and consequently direct the workers belonging to the 1st respondent Union, their men, agents or associates or anyone acting under them in any manner from interfering with the ingress and egress of men and materials in and out of the petitioner company or demonstrating or stalling work within 200 meters of the gates of the petitioner's factory. For Petitioner : M/s. M. Aravind Subramaniam For Respondents : Mr.V. Balamurugane Additional Public Prosecutor- (Pondy)- R2 No Appearance - R1 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

O R D E R

The prayer sought for in the present petition is to direct 2nd respondent herein to provide police protection for the moving of the machineries more specifically described in the scheduled to the petition from the petitioner's factory int he light of the 2nd representation dated 28.08.2018 and consequently direct the workers belonging to the 1st respondent Union, their men, agents or associates or anyone acting under them in any manner from interfering with the ingress and egress of men and materials in and out of the petitioner company or demonstrating or stalling work within 200 meters of the gates of the petitioner's factory.

2. Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that the prayer sought for has become infructuous and hence nothing survives in the writ petition.

3. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar ak To

1. The Sub Inspector of Police, Mettupalayam Police Station, Puducherry..

2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

+1 cc to Mr.M.Aravind Subramanian, Advocate, Sr.No. 31532 W.P.No.26283 of 2018 and WMP. No. 30528 of 2018 CSL/28.05.2019 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/