S.Valli v. The Deputy Superintendent

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED 23.10.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH Crl.O.P.No.23828 of 2018 S.Valli .. Petitioner Vs 1.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Tiruvannamalai.

2.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Tiruvannamalai.

.. Respondents Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondents not to harass the petitioner on the basis of the false complaint. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Suresh For Respondent : Mr.C.Raghavan, GA

O R D E R

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the respondents not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry.

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents. 3.Learned Government Advocate submitted that on the complaint given by one Geetha against the petitioner, petition enquiry is pending in S.P.C.No.2991 of 2018 on the file of the 2nd respondent. Learned Government Advocate also submitted that there are other complaints of job racketing against this petitioner.

4.In such view of the matter, the petitioner is directed to cooperate with the police for enquiry and at the time of conducting enquiry, the petitioner shall not be harassed. During the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

the 2nd respondent police is free to register an FIR and this order shall not be a shield for the petitioner against arrest. With the above direction, this petition is closed. Sd/- Deputy Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar gya To 1.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Tiruvannamalai.

2.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Tiruvannamalai.

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

+1cc to Mr.N.Suresh, Advocate, S.R.No.72647 Crl.O.P.No.23828 of 2018 rrs 31/10/2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/