K.R.Ramakrishnan v. State Rep By,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty Ninth day of October Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.14048 of 2018 IN RC.NO.1007 OF 2018 K.R.RAMAKRISHNAN [ PETITIONER ] Vs STATE REP BY, [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SPE, CBI EOW, CHENNAI.

F.I.R.NO.RC(E)/2003.

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein the High Court will be pleased to modify the condition that executing a bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) with two sureties each for like sum to the satisfaction of the Learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, E.O.II Egmore in Crl.M.P.No.11793 of 2018 IN CRL.RC.NO.1007/2018 DATED 19.09.2018.[crl.mp.no.14048/2018] Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.N.CHANDRASEKARAN Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.K.SRINIVASAN SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR FOR CBI CASES on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:- This Petition has been filed to modify the condition directing the petitioner to execute bond for Rs.50,000/-(Rupees Fifty thousand only) with two sureties each for like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, E.O.II, Egmore in Crl.M.P.No.11793 of 2018 in Crl.R.C.No. 1007 of 2018 dated 19.09.2018.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that by order dated 19.09.2018, this Court exempted the petitioner from surrendering and also suspended the sentence of imprisonment imposed on the petitioner with the condition that the petitioner to execute a bond for Rs.50,000/- with two sureties each for like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, E.O.II, Egmore. The learned counsel would submit that the petitioner had appeared before the trial Court and learned Judge is insisting that the petitioner shall produce original title deeds of documents worth about Rs.50,000/-. He would also submit that two persons are prepared to stand as sureties, but they do not posses any property whereas the trial Judge is insisting for production of original documents. He would submit that the sureties in the alternative are prepared to furnish F.D receipts worth Rs.50,000/- as security before https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

the trial Court.

3. The learned Special Public Prosecutor would submit that this Court has imposed the condition, that the petitioner should execute a bond for Rs.50,000/- with two sureties for a like sum and that the petitioner has to satisfy the learned Magistrate.

4. Taking into consideration, the above submissions, the condition is modified to the effect that each of the sureties shall furnish the original F.D. Receipts each for Rs.50,000/- before the trial Court. The learned Magistrate shall keep the F.D. Receipts in the custody of the Court till disposal of the revision. The other condition stands unaltered.

-sd/- 29/10/2018 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, E.O.II. EGMORE,CHENNAI 2 THE CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE,EGMORE,CHENNAI[FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE PRINCIPAL SESSIONS COURT CHENNAI 4 THE SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR FOR CBI CASES,HIGH COURT,MADRAS 5 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SPE, CBI EOW, CHENNAI.

F.I.R.NO.RC(E)/2003.

+1 C.C. to M/S.N.CHANDRASEKARAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO. 20398 Order in CRL MP.14048/2018 IN RC.NO.1007 OF 2018 Date :29/10/2018 From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format RD 31/10/2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/