← Library
Madras High CourtHCP/2414/2018allowed

Haritha v. Secy To Govt Hped Ch

2019-01-09Honourable Mrs Justice R. Hemalatha,Honourable Mr Justice C. T. Selvam4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 09.01.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE C.T.SELVAM and THE HONOURABLE Mrs.JUSTICE R.HEMALATHA H.C.P. No.2414 OF 2018 Haritha, w/o Madhankumar ... Petitioner -Vs1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Department of Prohibition and Excise (Home), Fort St George, Chennai 600 009.

2.The Commissioner of Police, Chennai City Police, Greater Chennai, Commissioner Office, Vepery, Chennai-600 007.

... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, calling for the records relating to the order of detention in BCDFGISSSV No.919/2018 dated, 06.10.2018 passed by the 2nd respondent and to quash the same and also to direct the detenu Madhankumar, S/o. Dhananjaya Naidu, aged 29 years, who is presently detained in the Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai to be produced before this Hon`ble court and set at liberty.

For Petitioner :

Mr.R.Thirumoorthy For Respondents:

Mr.R.Prathap Kumar Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

[Order of the Court was made by C.T.SELVAM, J.] The petitioner, who is the wife of the detenu, namely, Madhankumar, Son of Dhananjaya Naidu, aged 29 years, challenges the impugned order of detention, dated 06.10.2018 in BCDFGISSSV No.919/2018 detaining his husband as "GOONDA", as contemplated under Section 2(f) of the Tamil Nadu Prevention of dangerous activities of Boot leggers, Drug Offenders, Forest Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders, Sand Offenders, Slum-

grabbers and Video Pirates Act, 1982 (Tamil Nadu Act 14/1982).

2. The detenu has come to adverse notice in the following case:- S.No. Police Station & Crime No.

Section of Law 1.

S-8, Adambakkam P.S.

Cr.No.89/2018 454, 380 IPC S-8 Adambakkam P.S.

Cr.No.136/2018 380 IPC S-8 Adambakkam P.S., Cr.No.182/2018 454,380 IPC S-8, Adambakkam P.S., Cr.No.183/2018 454, 380 IPC S-8, Adambakkam P.S., Cr.No.448/2018 379 IPC S-8, Adambakkam P.S., Cr.No.464/2018 457, 380 IPC S-8, Adambakkam P.S., Cr.No.508/2018 454,380 IPC S-8, Adambakkam P.S., Cr.No.561/2018 454,380 IPC S-8, Adambakkam P.S., Cr.No.572/2018 380 IPC The ground case has been registered against the detenu in Crime No.577/2018 on 10.09.2018 the file of the Inspector of Police, S-8 Adambakkam Police Station for the offences u/s 341, 294(b), 323, 336, 392, 397 and 506(ii) IPC. The detention order has been passed by second respondent in BCDFGISSSV No.919/2018 on 06.10.2018.

3. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents. We have also perused the records produced by the Detaining Authority.

4. Though several grounds have been raised in the Habeas Corpus Petition, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, confines his argument only in respect of nonapplication of mind on the part of the detaining authority in passing the order of detention.

5. . The Grounds of Detention would reveal that several cases have been registered against the detenu and the ground case was registered against the detenu in Cr.No.577/2018 for the offences u/s. 341, 294(b), 323, 336, 392, 397 and 506(ii) IPC.

Admittedly, the detenu has not moved any bail application in the ground case. Therefore, the probability of release of the detenu imminently does not arise. Hence, we are inclined to set aside the detention order. Though the detaining authority has made reliance on similar case, in which an accused was granted bail, the facts involved in those cases are different. The principle of similarity cannot be applied mechanically. Normally, bails are granted based on the facts and circumstances of each case. Therefore, similar case plea, cannot be taken into consideration.

Hence, there is no material to substantiate that there is real possibility of the detenue coming out on bail and the said order was passed without application of mind.

6. In the result, the Habeas Corpus Petition is allowed and the order of detention in BCDFGISSSV No.919/2018 dated 06.10.2018, passed by the second respondent is set aside. The detenu, namely, Madhankumar, Son of Dhananjaya Naidu, aged about 29 years, is directed to be released forthwith unless his detention is required in connection with any other case. Sd/- Deputy Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar mst To:

1.The Secretary to Government, Department of Prohibition and Excise (Home), Fort St George, Chennai 600 009.

2.The Commissioner of Police, Chennai City Police, Greater Chennai, Commissioner Office, Vepery, Chennai-600 007.

3.The Superintendent, Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai.

4.The Joint Secretary Public (Law and order) Department, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009.

5.The Public Prosecutor High Court, Madras.

+2cc to Mr.R.Thirumoorthy, Advocate, S.R.No. 2589, 2380 H.C.P.No.2414 of 2018 GN(08/02/2019)