Union Of India v. The Central Administrative Tribunal
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 15.11.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P.DHANABAL W.P.Nos.29252 and 29685 of 2018 and WMP.Nos.34176 & 34649 of 2018 1.The Union of India, Rep by the Central Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Organization, Head Office, No.14, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi-110 066.
2.The Additional Central Provident Fund Commissioner (HRM), Employees Provident Fund Organization, Head Office, No.14, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi-110 066. 3.The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Organization, Regional Office, No.3, Municipality Building, Rajaji Salai, West Tambaram, Chennai-45.
4.The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Organization, Regional Office, No.3, Municipality Building, Rajaji Salai, West Tambaram, Chennai-45. ... Petitioners Vs.
1.The Central Administrative Tribunal, Rep by the Registrar, City Civil Court Building, High Court Complex, Chennai.
..
1st Respondent in both W.Ps.
2.L.Jayakanthan ..
2nd Respondent in W.P.No.29252 of 2018 3.R.Ramesh ..
2nd Respondent in W.P.No.29685 of 2018 PRAYER: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the first respondent viz., Central Administrative Tribunal, Chennai Bench in OA.No.310/00778/2016 and OA.No.310/00777/2016 respectively dated 11.08.2017 and quash the same. For Petitioner : M/s.V.Vijayshankar in both W.Ps.
For Respondents : R1 - Tribunal R2 - No Appearance COMMON ORDER [Order of the Court was made by D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J.] Mr.V.Vijayshankar, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the petitioners fairly stated before this court that the issue involved in the writ petitions is no longer res integra, as the same has already been covered by the Division Bench
decision of this Court in W.P.Nos.5981 of 2018, 7675 of 2018, 7676 of 2018 and 7677 of 2018 dated 31.08.2023.
2. In the light of the aforesaid Division Bench decision of this Court as well as the submission made by the learned Standing Counsel for the petitioners, the present writ petitions stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also dismissed.
(D.K.K., J.) (P.D.B., J.) 15.11.2023 Intex : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Jvm
D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J.
and P.DHANABAL, J.
Jvm W.P.Nos.29252 and 29685 of 2018 15.11.2023