Murugan v. The State Rep By Its,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 28.11.2018

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH Crl.O.P..No.25692 of 2018

1. Murugan

2. Valli

3. Ravikumar ... Petitioners Vs.

1. The State Rep by, The Inspector Police, District Crime Branch, Tiruvannamalai, Tiruvannamalai District.

2. Abdul Shet ... Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to call for the records culminated in Cr.No.17 of 2016 on the file of the first respondent and quash the same. For Petitioners : Mr.B.Jawahar For R1 : Mr.Mohamed Riyaz Additional Public Prosecutor For R2 : Mr.B.Ramakrishnan

ORDER

The Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the Cr.No.17 of 2016 on the file of the first respondent police, District Crime Branch, Tiruvannamalai District pursuant to the compromise arrived at by the parties.

2. The case is still in the stage of investigation. By passage of time, the parties have decided to bury their hatchet and compromise the dispute amicably among themselves.

3. A Joint Memo of Compromise has been filed before this Court which have been signed by the petitioners and the second respondent and also by their respective counsel. In order to identify the respective parties they have also produced the copy of the Aadhaar Card which is made part of the record. This Court also enquired both the parties and was satisfied that the parties have come to an amicable settlement between themselves.

4. Under such circumstances, no useful purpose will be https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

served in keeping the First Information Report pending, even though, the offences involved are not compoundable in nature. In the light of the guidelines given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in 2017 9 SCC 641-(Parbathbhai Aahir @ Parbathbhai Vs. State of Gujrath), this Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashes the Crime Cr.No.17 of 2016.

5. This Criminal Original Petition stands allowed and as a sequel, the proceedings in Cr.No.17 of 2016 on the file of the first respondent police, District Crime Branch, Tiruvannamalai District is quashed and the terms of Joint Memo of Compromise shall form part and parcel of this order. Each of the petitioner shall pay a sum of Rs.500/- as costs, to the credit of the Chief Justice Relief Fund (payable in Accounts Section of the High Court Registry), within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and file a photocopy of the receipt along with a memo reporting compliance in the Registry.

Xerox Copy of the Joint Memo of Compromise enclosed Sd/- Deputy Registrar //True copy// Sub Assistant Registrar dss To

1. The Inspector Police, District Crime Branch, Tiruvannamalai, Tiruvannamalai District.

2. The Additional Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras

3. The Section Officer, Accounts Section, High Court, Madras +1cc to Mr.B.Jawahar, Advocate SR.No.82349 +1cc to Mr.B.Ramakrishnan, Advocate SR.No.82378 Crl.O.P..No.25692 of 2018 GMY(10/12/2018) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/