P.Umamaheswari v. The Commissioner Of Land

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 19.12.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA W.P.No.31388 of 2018 P.Umamaheswari

...Petitioner

..Vs..

1. The Commissioner of Land Administration, Ezhilagam, Chepuak, Chennai-600 005.

2. The District Revenue Officer, District Revenue Office, Madurai.

3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, District Revenue Divisional Office, Madurai.

...Respondents

Prayer : Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 04.10.2018.

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Kannan For Respondents : Mr.V.Shanmugasundar Special Govenment Pleader

O R D E R

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the first respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 04.10.2018.

2. The prayer sought for in this Writ Petition is not maintainable. The first respondent has got no jurisdiction to consider the representation of the petitioner, as the representation is made against the order of the second https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

respondent. Hence, this Writ Petition stands dismissed. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the order of the District Revenue Officer/ the second respondent, it is open to him to challenge the same in the manner known to law or to file a suit before the civil court. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar arr To

1. The Commissioner of Land Administration, Ezhilagam, Chepuak, Chennai-600 005.

2. The District Revenue Officer, District Revenue Office, Madurai.

3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, District Revenue Divisional Office, Madurai.

+1 cc to Mr.K.Kannan, Advocate, S.R.No.88259 W.P.No.31388 of 2018 CP(CO) SSM(09/01/2019) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/