Valli v. Natesan

S.A.No.661 of 2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 12.11.2024

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA S.A.N o.661 of 2018 and C.M.P.No.20305 of 2018

1. Valli

2. Appavu

3. Ammasi ... Appellants ..Vs..

1. Natesan

2. Kathirvel

3. Murugan

4. Sankar

5. Arumugam ... Respondents PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 C.P.C., against the decree and judgment dated 02.08.2018 in A.S.No.68/2016 on the file of the II Additional Sub Judge, Villupuram, upholding the decree and judgment dated 16.11.2015 in O.S.No.130/2012 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Thirukoilur.

For Appellants : No appearance For Respondents : No appearance

JUDGMENT

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the appellants and the Respondents. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/2

S.A.No.661 of 2018 R. HEMALATHA, J.

vum 2.It is seen from the records that on several hearings, the counsel for the appellants did not appear before this Court and did not also take any steps to implead the legal heirs of the deceased second respondent.

3. Hence, this Second Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 12.11.2024 Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Speaking/Non-Speaking order vum To 1.The II Additional Sub Judge, Villupuram.

2.The Principal District Munsif, Thirukoilur. 3.The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras. S.A.N o.661 of 2018 and C.M.P.No.20305 of 2018 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/2