← Library
Madras High CourtWP/28859/2018disposed of

T.Abdul Washeed Shahib, v. The Inspector General Of Registration,

2018-10-31Honourable Mr Justice R. Mahadevan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 31.10.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P.No.28859 of 2018 T.Abdul Waheed Shahib ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Inspector General of Registration, Santhome High Road, Chennai.

2.The Sub Registrar, Office of SRO Vaniyambadi, Vaniyambadi, Vellore District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of mandamus, directing the second respondent to cancel the entry for Division 1063, page 243, No. & year 455/1976 and Division 1069, page 329, No & year 1208/1976 from Book No.I in Vaniyambadi Sub Registrar Office for the property bearing T.S.No.15 at Ward-E, Block 19, No.652, Chengam Street, Maslimpur, Vaniyambadi, Vellore District based on the petitioner's representation dated 29.08.2018. For Petitioner : Mr.K.P.Chandrasekaran For Respondents : Mr.T.M.Pappiah Special Government Pleader

ORDER

Mr.T.M.Pappiah, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents. By consent of both parties, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

2.The petitioner has come up with this writ petition seeking a direction to the respondent to consider his representation dated 29.08.2018.

3. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner submitted a representation dated 29.08.2018, seeking to cancel the entires made in documents bearing Nos.455/1976 and 1208/1976 in Book No.I on the file of the Vaniyambadi Sub Registrar Office in respect of the property bearing T.S.No.15 at Ward-E, Block 19, No.652, Chengam Street, Maslimpur, Vaniyambadi, Vellore District, but, the said representation has https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

not been considered by the second respondent. Hence, the petitioner is before this Court.

4. The learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents fairly submitted that second respondent would consider the representation of the petitioner on merits and in accordance with law.

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, this Court, without going into the merits of the case, directs the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 29.08.2018 and pass appropriate orders, on merits and in accordance with law, after affording due opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner as well as any of the interested parties, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6. With the above direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS IX) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar ms To 1.The Inspector General of Registration, Santhome High Road, Chennai.

2.The Sub Registrar, Office of SRO Vaniyambadi, Vaniyambadi, Vellore District.

+1cc to Mr.K.P.Chandrasekaran, Advocate, S.R.No.75078 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.75913 W.P.No.28859 of 2018 rrs 15/11/2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/