← Library
Madras High CourtWP/29845/2018disposed of

Hosur Industreis Asso v. State Of Tamil Nadu

2019-01-22Honourable Mr Justice K. Ravichandrabaabu3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED:22.01.2019

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU W.P.No.29845 of 2018 Hosur Industries Association, Plot No.159-A, SIPCOT Industrial Complex, Hosur - 635126.

Represented by its authorized signatory Mr.P.Arulanandan ...Petitioner Vs.

1. State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Secretary, Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600009.

2. The Commissioner, Hosur Municipality, No.1, Bangalore bypass Road, Hosur, Krishnagiri District.

3. The Managing Director, State Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu Ltd., (SIPCOT), 19-A, Rukmani Lakshmipathy Road, Egmore, Chennai-600008.

4. The District Collector, Krishnagiri, Collectorate, Krishnagiri, Tamil Nadu-635001. ...Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the second and first respondents to consider the representation dated 14.11.2017 made by the petitioner with respect to revision of Property Taxes for buildings situated within SIPCOT Industrial Complex at Hosur in line with Section 82 sub-section (2) (aa) of the Tamil Nadu District Municipalities Act, 1920.

For Petitioner :Mr.G.Balasubramanian For Respondents:Mr.D.Suriyanarayanan Additional Government Pleader for R1 & 4 Mr.N.Subbarayalu for R2 No Appearance for R3

O R D E R

This Writ Petition is filed for Mandamus directing the second and first respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 14.11.2017 with respect to revision of Property Taxes for buildings situated within SIPCOT Industrial Complex at Hosur in line with Section 82 sub-section (2) (aa) of the Tamil Nadu District Municipalities Act, 1920.

2. Heard both sides.

3. According to the petitioner, the proposed revision is not in line with the provisions made under the Tamil Nadu District Municipalities Act, 1920. Ventilating such grievance, the petitioner made such representation.

4. This Court, at this stage, is not expressing any view on the merits of the claim made by the petitioner as it is for the second respondent to consider and decide. Therefore, without expressing any view on the merits of the claim made by the petitioner, the second respondent is directed to consider the said representation dated 14.11.2017 and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS IV) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar sni To

1. Secretary to State of Tamil Nadu, Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600009.

2. The Commissioner, Hosur Municipality, No.1, Bangalore bypass Road, Hosur, Krishnagiri District.

3. The Managing Director, State Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu Ltd., (SIPCOT), 19-A, Rukmani Lakshmipathy Road, Egmore, Chennai-600008.

4. The District Collector, Krishnagiri, Collectorate, Krishnagiri, Tamil Nadu-635001.

+1cc to M/S.Leela & co, Advocate, S.R.No.5110 W.P.No.29845 of 2018 MP(CO) CS/31/01/2019