← Library
Madras High CourtA/9268/2018closed

Kamala Kumar V. Sole Arbitrator v. Equitas Small Finance Bank Ltd

2020-08-17Honourable Mr Justice N. Sathish Kumar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 17.08.2020 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR Application No.9268 of 2018 Ms.V.Kamala Kumar, Sole Arbitrator, No.301, Thambu Chetty Street, Chennai - 600 001.

...

Applicant versus 1.Equitas Small Finance Bank Ltd., Rep. by its Deputy Vice President - Legal, Spencer Plaza, 4th Floor, Phase-II, No.769, Mount Road, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 002.

2.Sri Balaji Tours and Travels, No.198/3, Sarjapura Main Road Indlubele (V) Attibele, Anekal, Bangalore, Karnataka - 562 107.

3.Bhagyalakshmi K.

S/d/w/o/Rajendra A.

No.115, Kote Street Attibele, Bangalore, Karnataka - 562 107.

4.S.R.S.Travels, No.321, T.S.P. Road, Opp. to Medical College, Kalasipalyam, Bangalore - 560 002.

...

Respondents 1/4

Prayer: Application filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of Original Side Rules read with Section 27(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to punish the respondent Nos.2 and 3 for having committed contempt of the order dated 11.06.2018 in Application No.31 of 2018 in Arbitration Case No.KK/ESFB/341/2018.

For Applicant : Mr.Sathyanarayana for Mr.Saravanan R.

For Respondents : No Appearance

O R D E R

This application has been filed to punish the respondent Nos.2 and 3 for having committed contempt of the order dated 11.06.2018 in Application No.31 of 2018 in Arbitration Case No.KK/ESFB/341/2018.

2. Now, it appears that the award itself has been passed on 24.10.2018. Though, the interim order passed by the Sole Arbitrator prohibiting and restraining the Garnishee/fourth respondent from making the payment upto a limit of Rs.12,67,679/- [Rupees Twelve Lakhs Sixty Seven Thousand Six Hundred Seventy Nine only] to the respondents 2 and 3 and also there is a direction to the Garnishee to deposit the same before the Tribunal. It is to be noted that such order has been passed without any proper reason as to the nature of the amount lying with the Garnishee. At any event, such award has already been passed, this Court is of the view that it is well open to the applicant to enforce the award as per law.

2/4

3. With the above observation, this application is closed. 17.08.2020 sri 3/4

N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.

sri Application No.9268 of 2018 17.08.2020 4/4