Madras High CourtCRP/3867/2018dismissed for nonprosecution

B.Senthilkumar v. Malarvizhi

2021-01-11Honourable Mr Justice Krishnan Ramasamy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 11.01.2021 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY C.R.P (NPD).No.3867 of 2018 and Cmp.Nos.21532 & 23277 of 2018 B.Senthilkumar ... Petitioner

Versus

Malarvizhi ... Respondent Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of Civil Procedure Code, to set aside the order dated 27.10.2018 passed in E.P.No.60 of 2018 in I.A.No.1741 of 2013 in OP.No.2037 of 2009, on the file of the III-Additional Family Court, Chennai. For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondent : No Appearance

ORDER

It is seen from the docket orders that on 09.12.2020, both counsel were absent and this Court directed the Registry to list the case on 06.01.2020. Even on the last occasion on 06.01.2021, none appeared for the petitioner and this matter was directed to be listed once again on 11.01.2021. 2.Even today (ie., 11.01.2021), when the matter is called, there was no representation for the petitioner as well as the respondent. It shows that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the case. Therefore, this Court is inclined to dismiss the Civil Revision Petition for default. 3.Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

-s/d- Assistant Registrar True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To The Judge, The III-Additional Family Court, Chennai.

C.R.P (PD).No.3867 of 2018 and Cmp.Nos.21532 & 23277 of 2018 aa11/02/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/