Madras High CourtCRP/3968/2018dismissed as infructuous

K.Ganesan v. V.Ranjeetham

2024-03-14Honourable Mr Justice S. Sounthar5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 14.03.2024

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR C.R.P.No.3968 of 2018 and C.M.P.No.22024 of 2018 K.Ganesan ... Petitioner Vs.

1.V.Ranjeetham 2.Minor R.Boopathy 3.Minor R.Priya 4.R.Santhi 5.M.Krishnaveni 6.M.Dharmalingam 7.K.Rasappan 8.G.Kalaiselvi 9.Radhamani 10.R.Chandrasekar 11.Muthumanickam 12.L.Ragunathan 13.C.Saraswathi 14.S.Santhi 15.A.Jayaraj 16.R.Senthilperumal 17.K.Mathuravalli 18.P.Ramasamy 19.R.Rajammal 20.P.Sumathi 21.S.Ganeshkumar 22.S.Rani 23.P.Subbulakshmi 1/5

24.S.R.Jayanthi 25.K.Devi 26.M.Bharathi 27.A.Amsavarthini 28.R.Chandrasekaran 29.V.Kumar 30.S.Sambaji 31.S.Deepak Kumar 32.R.Venkatesh 33.R.Muthu 34.K.Dhanam 35.R.Balamurugan 36.J.Prathap 37.A.Vijayakumar 38.N.Nithin Narayanamali 39.N.Sanjaikumar 40.B.Prakash 41.G.Shyamala 42.V.R.Mani 43.G.Srinivasan 44.P.Banumathi 45.S.Madheswaran 46.S.Arumugam 47.V.Sengodan 48.Balakrishnan 49.K.Ramakrishnan 50.P.Ramasamy 51.r.Rajammal 52.D.Natarajan 53.D.Murugesan 54.S.Pachiappan 55.A.M.Thangavel 56.G.Rajeswari 57.R.Saraswathi 58.R.Kalpanavalli

...Respondents

2/5

PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, praying to set aside the order and decreetal order dated 03.11.2018 made in Tr.O.P.No.109 of 2018 on the file of the Principal District Court, Salem praying the same be set aside and withdraw the suit in O.S.No.42 of 2011 pending before the Principal Sub-Judge, Salem to any other Sub-Ordinate Court in the District of Salem.

For Petitioner : M/sV.Srikanth For Respondent 1 : Mr.T.Sezhian for M/s.R.Meenal For respondents 2 & 3 : Minor represented by R4 For respondents 4 to 58 (except R25, 27, 29,30, 35, 36, 41 & R7) : served-no appearance For respondents 25, 27, : Not ready in notice 29,30, 35, 36, 41 & R7

ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioner made an endorsement stating that Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous. Therefore, nothing survives for further adjudication in this matter.

3/5

2. Recording the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs. 14.03.2024 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No nr To The learned Principal District Judge, Salem 4/5

S.SOUNTHAR , J.

nr C.R.P.No.3968 of 2018 and C.M.P.No.22024 of 2018 14.03.2024 5/5